Estranged relations: coercion and care in narratives of supported decision-making in mental healthcare

Stone, M., Kokanovic, R., Callard, F. and Broom, A. F. (2020) Estranged relations: coercion and care in narratives of supported decision-making in mental healthcare. Medical Humanities, 46(1), pp. 62-72. (doi: 10.1136/medhum-2018-011521) (PMID:31363013) (PMCID:PMC7042964)

[img] Text
233970.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.



Supported decision-making has become popular among policymakers and mental health advocates as a means of reducing coercion in mental healthcare. Nevertheless, users of psychiatric services often seem equivocal about the value of supported decision-making initiatives. In this paper we explore why such initiatives might be rejected or ignored by the would-be beneficiaries, and we reflect on broader implications for care and coercion. We take a critical medical humanities approach, particularly through the lens of entanglement. We analyse the narratives of 29 people diagnosed with mental illness, and 29 self-identified carers speaking of their experiences of an Australian mental healthcare system and of their views of supported decision-making. As a scaffolding for our critique we consider two supported decision-making instruments in the 2014 Victorian Mental Health Act: the advance statement and the nominated person. These instruments presuppose that patients and carers endorse a particular set of relationships between the agentic self and illness, as well as between patient, carer and the healthcare system. Our participant narratives instead conveyed ‘entangled’ relations, which we explore in three sections. In the first we show how ideas about fault and illness often coexisted, which corresponded with shifting views on the need for more versus less agency for patients. In the second section, we illustrate how family carers struggled to embody the supported decision-making ideal of the independent yet altruistic nominated person, and in the final section we suggest that both care and coercion were narrated as existing across informal/formal care divisions. We conclude by reflecting on how these dynamic relations complicate supported decision-making projects, and prompt a rethink of how care and coercion unfold in contemporary mental healthcare.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This project was funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Project grant (LP130100557) and supported by partner organisations including the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Mind Australia, Neami National, Wellways, Tandem Carers, Victorian Mental Illness Awareness Council, and Healthdirect Australia. FC is supported by Wellcome Trust (209513/Z/17/Z).
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Callard, Professor Felicity
Authors: Stone, M., Kokanovic, R., Callard, F., and Broom, A. F.
College/School:College of Science and Engineering > School of Geographical and Earth Sciences
Journal Name:Medical Humanities
Publisher:BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN (Online):1473-4265
Published Online:30 July 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020.
First Published:First published in Medical Humanities 46(1):62-72
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons license

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record