The effects of physical activity, fast-mimicking diet and psychological interventions on cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Clark, E., Maguire, H., Cannon, P. and Leung, E. Y.L. (2021) The effects of physical activity, fast-mimicking diet and psychological interventions on cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 57, 102654. (doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102654) (PMID:33359756) (PMCID:PMC8047871)

[img] Text
227465.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

2MB

Abstract

Background: Health professionals are often asked if non-pharmacological interventions prolong life. This review aims to evaluate the effects of physical activity, fast-mimicking diet (FMD) and psychological interventions on survival in all cancers. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs of physical activity, FMD and psychological interventions (including counselling, cognitive and other psychotherapies) in cancer patients that reported survival outcomes were included. Data sources: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 2020 were searched without language restrictions. The protocol was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019160944). Results: Thirty-one RCTs (9 on physical activity and 22 on psychological interventions) were included in the final analysis after evaluation of 60,207 records from our initial search. No eligible RCT on FMD was reported. RCTs on group psychological interventions (41.9%) and in patients with breast cancer (38.7%) were the most common. Most evaluated short-term interventions and in primary or adjuvant settings. Only one of 9 (11%) RCTs on physical activity and 8 of 22 (36%) RCTs on psychological interventions were associated with improved overall survival. Only group psychological interventions in breast cancer had adequate number of RCTs to allow a meta-analysis to be performed. It demonstrated a trend towards improved overall survival (HR -0.20, 95%CI -0.49 to 0.10), particularly in RCTs that evaluated long-term (>6 months) therapies (HR -0.29, 95%CI -0.59 to 0.01). Conclusion: Longer term interventions starting early in the patients’ care journey in primary and adjuvant settings have shown the most promise for improving survival. Better designed RCTs including survival outcomes are particularly needed in non-breast cancers.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Leung, Dr Elaine and Cannon, Dr Paul
Authors: Clark, E., Maguire, H., Cannon, P., and Leung, E. Y.L.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Infection & Immunity
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
University Services > Library and Collection Services > Library
Journal Name:Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0965-2299
ISSN (Online):1873-6963
Published Online:25 December 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 The Authors
First Published:First published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine 57: 102654
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
305044Deciphering the role of the CCR7/CCL21 chemokine axis in ovarian cancerElaine LeungCancer Research UK (CRUK)C66863/A28146Med - Reproductive and Maternal Medicine