Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: a replication study

Shiramizu, V. , Docherty, C., Debruine, L. M. and Jones, B. C. (2020) Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: a replication study. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0242262. (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242262) (PMID:33186368) (PMCID:PMC7665808)

[img] Text
227179.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

411kB

Abstract

Many researchers have proposed that straight men prefer women’s faces displaying feminine shape characteristics at least partly because mating with such women will produce healthier offspring. Although a prediction of this adaptation-for-mate-choice hypothesis is that straight men will show stronger preferences for feminized versus masculinized versions of women’s faces than will gay men, only one previous study has directly tested this prediction. Here we directly replicated that study by comparing 623 gay and 3163 straight men’s preferences for feminized versus masculinized versions of faces. Consistent with the adaptation-for-mate-choice hypothesis of straight men’s femininity preferences, we found that straight men showed significantly stronger preferences for feminized female faces than did gay men. Consistent with previous research suggesting that gay men place a premium on masculinity in potential romantic partners, we also found that gay men showed significantly stronger preferences for masculinized versions of male faces than did straight men. Together, these findings indicate the sexual orientation contributes to individual differences in men’s face preferences.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Shiramizu, Dr Victor and DeBruine, Professor Lisa and Jones, Professor Benedict
Creator Roles:
Shiramizu, V.Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
Debruine, L.Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
Jones, B.Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
Authors: Shiramizu, V., Docherty, C., Debruine, L. M., and Jones, B. C.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Psychology & Neuroscience
College of Science and Engineering > School of Psychology
Journal Name:PLoS ONE
Publisher:Public Library of Science
ISSN:1932-6203
ISSN (Online):1932-6203
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 The Authors
First Published:First published in PLoS ONE 15(11):e0242262
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License
Related URLs:

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
172112KINSHIP: How do humans recognise kin?Lisa DebruineEuropean Research Council (ERC)647910NP - Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (CCNi)