Invoking intersectionality: discursive mobilisations in feminism of the radical left

Morrison, J. (2021) Invoking intersectionality: discursive mobilisations in feminism of the radical left. Social Movement Studies, 20(6), pp. 635-651. (doi: 10.1080/14742837.2020.1858779)

[img] Text
226644.pdf - Accepted Version

356kB

Abstract

Over the past ten years the concept of intersectionality has become increasingly popular in feminist activism. Yet, how intersectionality is used within grassroots movements remains understudied. This article explores intersectionality in feminism within the radical left using a case study of the 2014 Scottish independence movement. The article draws on analysis of 37 semi-structured interviews carried out during the referendum campaign of 2014. Building on black feminist critiques, I highlight that intersectionality is taken up in ways that reproduce rather than tackle hegemonic norms of gender identity, race, class and age. I trace a disjuncture between interviewee claims to be intersectional and simultaneous perceptions of multi-dimensional marginalisations. I explore interviewee discussion of trans-inclusion as illustrative of how axes of intersectionality can be mobilised in ways that sustain hegemonic norms. Interviewees tended to legitimise their claims to intersectionality through invoking the trope of the ‘TERF’ – trans-exclusionary radical feminist – as a symbol of a selectively defined second-wave feminism elided with radical feminism. This invocation paradoxically reproduced marginalisations of race, class and even gender identity itself.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Morrison, Dr Jenny
Authors: Morrison, J.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Social Movement Studies
Publisher:Taylor and Francis
ISSN:1474-2837
ISSN (Online):1474-2829
Published Online:11 December 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
First Published:First published in Social Movement Studies 20(6): 635-651
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record