Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol

Musa, M. K. et al. (2020) Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open, 10(11), e040397. (doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397) (PMID:33191266)

[img] Text
223590.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.



Introduction: Care homes provide nursing and social care for older people who can no longer live independently at home. In the UK, there is no consistent approach to how information about residents’ medical history, care needs and preferences are collected and shared. This limits opportunities to understand the care home population, have a systematic approach to assessment and documentation of care, identifiy care home residents at risk of deterioration and review care. Countries with standardised approaches to residents’ assessment, care planning and review (eg, minimum data sets (MDS)) use the data to understand the care home population, guide resource allocation, monitor services delivery and for research. The aim of this realist review is to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care of individual residents. Methods and analysis: A realist review will be conducted in three research stages. Stage 1 will scope the literature and develop candidate programme theories of what ensures effective uptake and sustained implementation of an MDS. Stage2 will test and refine these theories through further iterative searches of the evidence from the literature to establish how effective uptake of an MDS can be achieved. Stage 3 will consult with relevant stakeholders to test or refine the programme theory (theories) of how an MDS works at the resident level of care for different stakeholders and in what circumstances. Data synthesis will use realist logic to align data from each eligible article with possible context–mechanism–outcome configurations or specific elements that answer the research questions. Ethics and dissemination: The University of Hertfordshire Ethics Committee has approved this study (HSK/SF/UH/04169). Findings will be disseminated through briefings with stakeholders, conference presentations, a national consultation on the use of an MDS in UK long-term care settings, publications in peer-reviewed journals and in print and social media publications accessible to residents, relatives and care home staff. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020171323; this review protocol is registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This study/project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Service Research and Delivery programme (HS&DR NIHR127234) and supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) East of England.
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Burton, Dr Jenni
Authors: Musa, M. K., Akdur, G., Hanratty, B., Kelly, S., Gordon, A., Peryer, G., Spilsbury, K., Killett, A., Burton, J., Meyer, J., Fortescue, S., Towers, A.-M., Irvine, L., and Goodman, C.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences
Journal Name:BMJ Open
Publisher:BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN (Online):2044-6055
Published Online:14 November 2020
First Published:First published in BMJ Open 10(11):e040397

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record