Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., Scotto, T. J. , Reifler, J., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. (2011) Yes we can! Valence politics and electoral choice in America, 2008. Electoral Studies, 30(3), pp. 450-461. (doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.11.013)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
The claim that the 2008 presidential election was a transformative one is fast becoming part of the conventional wisdom of American politics. Despite the election’s undoubted significance, this paper argues that factors affecting voting decisions were strikingly similar to those operating in many previous presidential elections. Using data from the CCAP six-wave national election survey, we demonstrate that a valence politics model provides a powerful, parsimonious explanation of the ballot decisions Americans made in 2008. As is typical in presidential elections, candidate images had major effects on electoral choice. Controlling for several other relevant factors, racial attitudes were strongly associated with how voters reacted to the candidates. Other models of electoral choice, such as a Downsian issue-proximity model, are also relevant, but their explanatory power is considerably less than that provided by the valence politics model.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Scotto, Professor Thomas |
| Authors: | Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., Scotto, T. J., Reifler, J., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C., and Whiteley, P. |
| College/School: | College of Social Sciences |
| Journal Name: | Electoral Studies |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 0261-3794 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1873-6890 |
| Published Online: | 19 November 2010 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
Deposit and Record Details