Revisiting comparative pedagogy: methodologies, themes, and research communities since 2000

Schweisfurth, M. , Thomas, M. A.M. and Smail, A. (2022) Revisiting comparative pedagogy: methodologies, themes, and research communities since 2000. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(4), pp. 560-580. (doi: 10.1080/03057925.2020.1797475)

[img] Text
220762.pdf - Accepted Version

431kB
[img]
Preview
Text
220762Suppl.pdf - Supplemental Material

266kB

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of contemporary comparative research on pedagogy, as published since 2000. It explores this sub-field of comparative education inquiry over this period, including how it has responded to new global movements, changing balances of power, and methodological advances. While these have shaped the field in recognisable ways, differing responses to these among researchers from contrasting research traditions have resulted in divergence as well as convergence. This divergence has created distinct typologies of studies that reflect particular epistemic communities of researchers, depending on how context and the purpose of research are perceived. The scoping review is based on a survey of 51 articles identified through a systematic search of 10 English-language journals in the field of comparative and international education.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Thomas, Dr Matthew and Smail, Ms Amy and Schweisfurth, Professor Michele
Authors: Schweisfurth, M., Thomas, M. A.M., and Smail, A.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Education
College of Social Sciences > School of Education > Educational Leadership & Policy
Journal Name:Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0305-7925
ISSN (Online):1469-3623
Published Online:07 August 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 British Association for International and Comparative Education
First Published:First published in Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 52(4): 560-580
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record