Fong, L. C. W., Ford, T. J. , da Costa, B. R., Jüni, P. and Berry, C. (2020) Bias and loss to follow-up in cardiovascular randomized trials: a systematic review. Journal of the American Heart Association, 9(14), e015361. (doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015361) (PMID:32646264) (PMCID:PMC7660731)
|
Text
216674.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB |
Abstract
Background: Loss to follow‐up (LTFU) is common in randomized controlled trials. However, its potential impact on primary outcomes from cardiovascular randomized controlled trials is not known. Methods and Results: We conducted a prospective systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42019121959) for randomized controlled trials published in 8 leading journals over 5 years from January 2014 to December 2018. Extent, reporting, and handling of LTFU data were recorded, and the proportion of a trial's primary outcome results that lose statistical significance was calculated after making plausible assumptions for the intervention and control arms. These assumptions could drive differential treatment effects between the groups considering relative event incidence between LTFU participants and those included in the primary outcome. We identified 117 randomized controlled trials of which 91 (78%) trials reported LTFU, 23 (20%) reported no LTFU, and 3 (3%) trials did not report on whether LTFU occurred. The median percentage of study participants lost to follow‐up was 2% (interquartile range, 0.33%–5.3%). Only 10 trials (9%) had a low cluster of risk factors for impairment in trial quality. The percentage of trials losing statistical significance varied from 2% when the relative event incidence for LTFU between the randomized groups was 1 for the intervention arm and 1.5 for the control arm to 16% when the relative event incidence was 3 for the intervention arm and 1 for the control arm. Conclusions: Almost 1 in 6 (16%) cardiovascular randomized trials published in leading journals may have a change in the primary outcome if plausible assumptions are made about differential event rates of participants lost to follow up. There is scope for improvement arising from LTFU in randomized trials in cardiovascular medicine.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Berry, Professor Colin and Ford, Thomas |
| Authors: | Fong, L. C. W., Ford, T. J., da Costa, B. R., Jüni, P., and Berry, C. |
| College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing |
| Journal Name: | Journal of the American Heart Association |
| Publisher: | American Heart Association, by Wiley |
| ISSN: | 2047-9980 |
| ISSN (Online): | 2047-9980 |
| Published Online: | 09 July 2020 |
| Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2020 The Authors |
| First Published: | First publishe in Journal of the American Heart Association 9:e015361 |
| Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Funder and Project Information
Funder and Project Information