Fluoride varnish in nursery schools: a randomised controlled trial – Protecting Teeth @3

McMahon, A. D. , Wright, W. , Anopa, Y. , McIntosh, E. , Turner, S. , Conway, D. I. and Macpherson, L. M.D. (2020) Fluoride varnish in nursery schools: a randomised controlled trial – Protecting Teeth @3. Caries Research, (doi: 10.1159/000509680) (Early Online Publication)

[img]
Preview
Text
216671.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

300kB

Abstract

Studies suggest that fluoride varnish (FV) application can reduce dental caries in child populations. The multiple-component national child oral health improvement programme in Scotland (Childsmile) includes nursery-based universal supervised toothbrushing and deprivation-targeted FV applications, together with community and dental practice prevention interventions. This trial, a double-blind, two-arm randomised control trial, aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the nursery-based FV applications plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) Childsmile programme interventions, compared to TAU Childsmile interventions alone, in children not targeted to receive nursery FV as part of the programme. Participating children in the first year of nursery (aged three), with or without existing caries, were randomised to either FV or TAU and followed up for 24 months until the first year of primary school. Treatments were administered at six-monthly intervals. The primary endpoint was “worsening of d3mft” from baseline to 24 months. Secondary endpoints were worsening of d3mfs, d3t, mt, and ft. Individual record-linkage captured wider programme activities and tertiary endpoints. A total of 1,284 children were randomised, leading to 1,150 evaluable children (n = 577 FV, n = 573 TAU, 10% dropouts). Mean age was 3.5 years, 50% were female (n = 576), 17% had caries at baseline (n = 195), all balanced between the groups. Most children received three/four treatments. Overall, 26.9% (n = 155) had worsened d3mft in the FV group, and 31.6% (n = 181) in the TAU group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.80 (0.62–1.03), p = 0.078. The results for worsening of the secondary endpoints were: d3mfs 0.79 (0.61–1.01) p = 0.063, d3t 0.75 (0.57–0.99) p = 0.043, mt 1.34 (0.75–2.39) p = 0.319, and ft 0.77 (0.53–1.14) p = 0.191. We calculated a number needed to treat of 21 and a cost of GBP 686 to prevent a single worsening of d3mft. There was a modest non-significant reduction in the worsening of d3mft in the nursery FV group compared to TAU, suggesting that this intervention is unlikely to represent an effective or cost-effective addition to the population oral health improvement programme.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This study was funded as part of the evaluation programme of the Childsmile programme which is funded by the Scottish Government.
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Wright, Mr William and Anopa, Ms Yulia and Macpherson, Professor Lorna and McIntosh, Professor Emma and McMahon, Dr Alex and Conway, Professor David
Authors: McMahon, A. D., Wright, W., Anopa, Y., McIntosh, E., Turner, S., Conway, D. I., and Macpherson, L. M.D.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing > Dental School
Journal Name:Caries Research
Publisher:Karger
ISSN:0008-6568
ISSN (Online):1421-976X
Published Online:10 September 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 The Authors
First Published:First published in Caries Research 2020
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record