Filtering vibroseis data in the precorrelation domain

Qin, S. and Smythe, D.K. (1998) Filtering vibroseis data in the precorrelation domain. Geophysical Prospecting, 46(3), pp. 303-322. (doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1998.00092.x)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Vibroseis data recorded at short source–receiver offsets can be swamped by direct waves from the source. The signal‐to‐noise ratio, where primary reflections are the signal and correlation side lobes are the noise, decreases with time and late reflection events are overwhelmed. This leads to low seismic resolution on the vibroseis correlogram. A new precorrelation filtering approach is proposed to suppress correlation noise. It is the ‘squeeze‐filter‐unsqueeze’ (SFU) process, a combination of ‘squeeze’ and ‘unsqueeze’ (S and U) transformations, together with the application of either an optimum least‐squares filter or a linear recursive notch filter. SFU processing provides excellent direct wave removal if the onset time of the direct wave is known precisely, but when the correlation recognition method used to search for the first arrival fails, the SFU filtering will also fail. If the tapers of the source sweeps are badly distorted, a harmonic distortion will be introduced into the SFU‐filtered trace. SFU appears to be more suitable for low‐noise vibroseis data, and more effective when we know the sweep tapers exactly. SFU requires uncorrelated data, and is thus cpu intensive, but since it is automatic, it is not labour intensive.  With non‐linear sweeps, there are two approaches to the S,U transformations in SFU. The first requires the non‐linear analytical sweep formula, and the second is to search and pick the zero nodes on the recorded pilot trace and then carry out the S,U transformations directly without requiring the algorithm or formula by which the sweep was generated. The latter method is also valid for vibroseis data with a linear sweep. SFU may be applied to the removal of any undesired signal, as long as the exact onset time of the unwanted signal in the precorrelation domain is known or determinable.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Smythe, Professor David
Authors: Qin, S., and Smythe, D.K.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences
Journal Name:Geophysical Prospecting
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:0016-8025
ISSN (Online):1365-2478

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record