Contrasting effects of high-starch and high-sugar diets on ruminal function in cattle

Francesio, A., Viora, L. , Denwood, M. J., Tulley, W., Brady, N., Hastie, P. , Hamilton, A., Davison, C., Michie, C. and Jonsson, N. N. (2020) Contrasting effects of high-starch and high-sugar diets on ruminal function in cattle. Journal of Dairy Research, (doi: 10.1017/S002202992000031X) (PMID:32314683) (Early Online Publication)

[img]
Preview
Text
211963.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

310kB
[img]
Preview
Text
211963Suppl.pdf - Supplemental Material

214kB

Abstract

The experiment reported in this research paper aimed to determine whether clinical and subclinical effects on cattle were similar if provided with isoenergetic and isonitrogenous challenge diets in which carbohydrate sources were predominantly starch or sugar. The study was a 3 × 3 Latin square using six adult Jersey cows with rumen cannulae, over 9 weeks. In the first 2 weeks of each 3 week experimental period cows were fed with a maintenance diet and, in the last week, each animal was assigned to one of three diets: a control diet (CON), being a continuation of the maintenance diet; a high starch (HSt) or a high sugar (HSu) diet. Reticuloruminal pH and motility were recorded throughout the study period. Blood and ruminal samples were taken on day-1 (TP-1), day-2 (TP-2) and day-7 (TP-7) of each challenge week. Four clinical variables were recorded daily: diarrhoea, inappetence, depression and ruminal tympany. The effects of treatment, hour of day and day after treatment on clinical parameters were analysed using linear mixed effects (LME) models. Although both challenge diets resulted in a decline in pH, an increase in the absolute pH residuals and an increase in the number of minutes per day under pH 5.8, systemic inflammation was only detected with the HSt diet. The challenge diets differentially modified amplitude and period of reticuloruminal contractions compared with CON diet and both were associated with an increased probability of diarrhoea. The HSu diet reduced the probability of an animal consuming its complete allocation. Because the challenge diets were derived from complex natural materials (barley and molasses respectively), it is not possible to assign all the differential effects to the difference in starch and sugar concentration: non-starch components of barley or non-sugar components of molasses might have contributed to some of the observations. In conclusion, substituting much of the starch with sugar caused no substantial reduction in the acidosis load, but inflammatory response was reduced while feed rejection was increased.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:The work was partially funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Research Council, UK (Industrial Partnership Award BB/J016373/1, BB/J016608/1 and BB/J018120/1).
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Jonsson, Professor Nicholas and Hastie, Dr Peter and Denwood, Dr Matthew and Francesio, Andrea and Brady, Mrs Nicola and Viora, Dr Lorenzo
Authors: Francesio, A., Viora, L., Denwood, M. J., Tulley, W., Brady, N., Hastie, P., Hamilton, A., Davison, C., Michie, C., and Jonsson, N. N.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Veterinary Medicine
Journal Name:Journal of Dairy Research
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:0022-0299
ISSN (Online):1469-7629
Published Online:21 April 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 The Authors
First Published:First published in Journal of Dairy Research 2020
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
167846Sub-acute and acute ruminal acidosis; an interdisciplinary approach to understand and prevent a multifactorial disease.Nicholas JonssonBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)BB/J018120/1Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine