Clinical risk scores for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia: a systematic review

Kishore, A. K. et al. (2016) Clinical risk scores for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. European Stroke Journal, 1(2), pp. 76-84. (doi:10.1177/2396987316651759) (PMID:31008268) (PMCID:PMC6301233)

[img]
Preview
Text
204340.pdf - Accepted Version

218kB

Abstract

Purpose: Several risk stratification scores for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia have been derived. We aimed to evaluate the performance and clinical usefulness of such scores for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia. Method: A systematic literature review was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, with application of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy-2 tool. Published studies of hospitalised adults with ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage, or both, which derived and validated an integer-based clinical risk score, or externally validated an existing score to predict occurrence of stroke-associated pneumonia, were considered and independently screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Findings: We identified nine scores, from eight derivation cohorts. Age was a component of all scores, and the NIHSS score in all except one. Six scores were internally validated and five scores were externally validated. The A2DS2 score (Age, Atrial fibrillation, Dysphagia, Severity [NIHSS], Sex) was the most externally validated in 8 independent cohorts. Performance measures were reported for eight scores. Discrimination tended to be more variable in the external validation cohorts (C statistic 0.67–0.83) than the derivation cohorts (C statistic 0.74–0.85). Discussion: Overall, discrimination and calibration were similar between the different scores. No study evaluated influence on clinical decision making or prognosis. Conclusion: The clinical prediction scores varied in their simplicity of use and were comparable in performance. Utility of such scores for preventive intervention trials and in clinical practice remains uncertain and requires further study.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Langhorne, Professor Peter
Authors: Kishore, A. K., Vail, A., Bray, B. D., Chamorro, A., Napoli, M. D., Kalra, L., Langhorne, P., Montaner, J., Roffe, C., Rudd, A. G., Tyrrell, P. J., de Beek, D. v., Woodhead, M., Meisel, A., and Smith, C. J.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences
Journal Name:European Stroke Journal
Publisher:SAGE Publications
ISSN:2396-9873
ISSN (Online):2396-9881
Published Online:01 June 2016
Copyright Holders:Copyright © European Stroke Organisation 2016
First Published:First published in European Stroke Journal 1(2):76-84
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record