Abrams, F. (2012, October 25). Cultural literacy: Michael Gove’s school of hard facts [online
article]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20041597
ACARA. (2014). The Australian curriculum: Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/
Allsop, T., & Woolnough, B. (1990). The relationship of technology to science in English schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(2), 127–136. doi:10.1080/0022027900220202
Andersen, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. London: Penguin Book Ltd.
Atkinson, S. (1990). Design and technology in the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology
Education, 2(1), 1–12. Retrieved from https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v2n1/pdf/atkinson.
pdf doi:10.21061/jte.v2i1.a.2
BACC for the Future. (2018). https://www.baccforthefuture.com/
Bakhurst, D. (2007). Vygotsky’s demons. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The
Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161. doi:10.1080/03075079412331382007
Bell, D., Morrison-Love, D., Wooff, D., & McLain, M. (2017). Analysing design and technology as an educational construct: An investigation into its curriculum position and pedagogical identity.
The Curriculum Journal, 28(4), 539–558. doi:10.1080/09585176.2017.1286995
Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D.
Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London:
Collier MacMillan.
Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmission (Vol. III). London: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse: Class codes and control (Vol. IV). London: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (revised ed.), New York: Rowman and Little.
Biesta, G. (2014). Pragmatising the curriculum: Bringing knowledge back into the curriculum conversation, but via pragmatism. The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 29–49. doi:10.1080/09585176.2013.874954
Biesta, G., & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Biglan, A. (1973a). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213. doi:10.1037/h0034699
Biglan, A. (1973b). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. doi:10.1037/h0034701
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook 1, cognitive domain. New York: Longman Higher Education.
Black, P., & Harrison, G. (1985). In place of confusion: Technology and science in the school curriculum. London: Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust.
Bronowski, J. (2011). The ascent of man. London: BBC Books.
Bruner, J. S. (2009). Culture, Mind, and education. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists. In their own words. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Campbell, J. (2011). Why do language use and tool use both count as manifestations of intelligence? In T. McCormack, C. Hoerl, & S. Butterfill, (Eds.), Tool use and causal cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Problem finding skills as components of the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 155–162. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90185-6
Claxton, G., Lucas, B., & Webster, R. (2010). Bodies of knowledge: How the learning sciences could transform practical and vocational education. London: Edge Foundation.
Cole, M. (2007). Cultural psychology. In Y. Engestr€om, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punam€aki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. London: Harvard University Press.
Cole, M., & Gajdamaschko, N. (2007). Vygotsky and culture. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch(Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. Oxford, UK: Berg Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Germany: Springer.
Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55. doi:10.1162/074793601750357196
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energetic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), 159–176. doi:10.1016/0732-118X(88)90001-3
Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dave, R. (1967). Psychomotor domain. Berlin: International Conference of Educational Testing.
DES/WO. (1988). National curriculum design and technology working group: Interim report.
London: Department for Education and Science and the Welsh Office.
DfE. (2019). Guidance: English Baccalaureate (EBacc) [online]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-baccalaureate-ebacc/english-baccalaureate-ebacc
DfE. (2016). Educational excellence everywhere [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/educational-excellence-everywhere
DfE. (2015). Design and technology GCSE subject content [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gcse-design-and-technology
DfE. (2013). National curriculum in England: Framework document [electronic document].
Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-curriculum
DfE. (2011). The framework for the national curriculum: A report by the Expert Panel for the
National Curriculum review. London: Department for Education.
DfE. (1995). Design and technology in the national curriculum. London: Department for Education.
D&TA. (2018). Designed and made in Britain? [online article]. Retrieved from https://www.data. org.uk/campaign/
de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Netherlands: Springer.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
Eggleston, J. (1996). Teaching design and technology (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Engestrom, Y. (2009). Expansive learning: Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists. In their own words. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. London: Routledge.
Ferr�e, F. (1988). Philosophy of technology. Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Florman, S. (1987). The civilized engineer. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Froebel, F. (1908). The education of man. Translated by W. N. Hailmann. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Gibb, N. (2017). The importance of knowledge-based education [speech]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-importance-of-knowledge-based-education
Greenfield, P. M. (1991). Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(4), 531–551. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00071235
Gumbo, M. T. (2017). Alternative Knowledge Systems. In P. J. Williams & K. Stables (Eds.), Critique in Design and Technology Education. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Hardy, A. (2017). How did the expert panel conclude that D&T should be moved to a basic curriculum? In E. Norman & K. Baynes (Eds.), Design Epistemology and Curriculum Planning. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough Design Press Ltd.
Harrison, A. (2013). More work-based ’studio schools’ announced [online article]. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-22091861
Harrison, M. (2011). Supporting the T and the E in STEM: 2004–2010. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 17–25.
Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain. New York: David McKay Co.
Hickman, L. A. (2001). Philosophical tools for technological culture: Putting pragmatism to work. Bloomington, USA: Indiana University Press.
Jeffreys, B. (2017, June 27). What now for grammar schools? [online article]. Retrieved from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-40384549
Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002
Kimbell, R. (2018). Constructs of quality and the power of holism. In Proceedings of PATT36
research and practice in technology education: Perspectives on human capacity and development (pp. 181–186). Athlone Institute of Technology, Co. Westmeath, Ireland, 18–21 June 2018.
Kimbell, R., Stables, K., & Green, R. (1996). Understanding practice in design and technology. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
McGarr, O., & Lynch, R. (2015). Monopolising the STEM agenda in second-level schools:
Exploring power relations and subject subcultures. International Journal of Technology and
Design Education, 27(1), 51–62. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9333-0
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2), 141–159. doi:10.1023/A:1008819912213
McGimpsey, I. (2011). RSA design & society. A review of literature on design education in the national curriculum [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/rsa_dt-lit_review_final.pdf
McGinn, R. (1978). What is technology? Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1, 179–197.
McLain, M., Bell, D., Wooff, D., & Morrison-Love, D. (2018). Cultural and historical roots for design and technology education: Why technology makes us human. In Proceedings of PATT36 Research and Practice in Technology Education: Perspectives on Human Capacity and Development (pp. 223–230). Athlone Institute of Technology, Co. Westmeath, Ireland, 18–21 June 2018,.
McLain, M. (2012). The importance of technological activity and designing and making activity, a historical perspective. In Proceedings of PATT26 Technology Education in the 21st Century.
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Link€oping Universitet.
Marranzo, R. J., & Kendell, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Miller, J. (2011). RSA design & society. What’s wrong with DT? [electronic document]. Retrieved from https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/rsa_whats-wrong-with-dt.pdf
MoE. (2017). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum/Technology
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: A path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Morrison-Love, D. (2017). Towards a transformative epistemology of technology education.
Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 23–37. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12226
Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilisation. New York: Harcourt Brace.
NCC. (1990). Technology in the national curriculum. London: Department for Education and
Science and the Welsh Office.
Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2007). Oh yeah, yeah you get a lot of love hearts. The Year 9s are notorious for love hearts. Everything is love hearts.’ Fixation in pupils’ design and technology work (11–16 years). Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12(1), 34–44.
Nickerson, R. S. (2005). Technology and cognition amplification. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers.
Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: a conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417. doi:10.1080/
0307507022000011525
O’Sullivan, G. (2013). Design and technology education: Vocational or academic? A case of yin and yang. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Debates in design and technology education. Oxon, UK:Routledge.
Paechter, C. (1995). Subcultural retreat: Negotiating the design and technology curriculum.
British Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 75–87.
Paton, G. (2013, April 24). New D&T curriculum axed over ’dumbing down’ fears [online article]. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10016110/New-DandTcurriculum-
axed-over-dumbing-down-fears.html
Pavlova, M. (2005). Knowledge and values in technology education. International Journal of
Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 127–147. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-8280-6
Penfold, J. (1987). From handicraft to craft design and technology. Studies in Design Education Craft and Technology, 20(1), 34–48.
Rasinen, A. (2003). An analysis of the technology education curriculum of six countries. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 31–47. Retrieved from https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v15n1/pdf/rasinen.pdf doi:10.21061/jte.v15i1.a.3
Reiss, M., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. IOE Press: London
Roe Smith, M. (1994). Technological determinism is American culture. In M. Roe Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press.
Russell, D. R. (1993). Vygotsky, Dewey, and externalism: Beyond the student/discipline dichotomy. Journal of Advanced Composition, 13(1), 173–197
Ryle, G. (1949). 1990). The concept of mind. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (2003). Philosophy of technology: The technological condition (an anthology). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Washington: Gryphon House.
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 189–202.
Tallis, R. (2003). The hand: A philosophical inquiry into the human being. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Tappan, M. B. (1997). Language, culture, and moral development: A Vygotskian perspective.
Developmental Review, 17(1), 78–100. doi:10.1006/drev.1996.0422
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge. USA: Harvard University Press
Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1930/1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. Publishing Company.
Welham, H. (2015, September 22). University technical colleges: Five years on, the jury’s still out [online article]. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/sep/22/university-technical-colleges-five-years-on-the-jurys-still-out
White, J. (2018). The weakness of ‘powerful knowledge’. London Review of Education, 16(2),
325–335. doi:10.18546/LRE.16.2.11
Williams, P. J., & Wellbourne-Wood, S. (2006). Design for experience: A new rationale. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 11(2), 9–19.
Wolpert, L. (2003). Causal belief and the origins of technology. Philosophical Transfers of the Royal Society London, 361(1809), 1709–1719. doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1231
Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
References
References