Accounting for covariate distributions in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models. A case study in the alpine environment

Amato, G., Eisank, C., Castro-Camilo, D. and Lombardo, L. (2019) Accounting for covariate distributions in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models. A case study in the alpine environment. Engineering Geology, 260, 105237. (doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105237)

Amato, G., Eisank, C., Castro-Camilo, D. and Lombardo, L. (2019) Accounting for covariate distributions in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models. A case study in the alpine environment. Engineering Geology, 260, 105237. (doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105237)

[img] Text
195444.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 August 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

41MB

Abstract

Thousands or even million of pixels can be contained in a single Slope Unit. Hence, each covariate used in spatial predictive models is characterized by a distribution of values for each Slope Unit. Here, we model the whole covariates' distribution within Slope Units for landslide susceptibility purposes. This is done by finely dissecting each covariate into quantiles and then modeling the susceptibility via a LASSO penalized Binary Logistic Regression. We choose a LASSO penalization because the common Stepwise procedure is not selective enough to shrink a large number of covariates to an interpretable subset (which we also demonstrate here). LASSO mostly selects 6 covariates out of 372 to explain the spatial distribution of shallow landslides in the Upper Badia valley, Italian Alps. This allows us to verify that the selection does not include any quantile close to the median hence, nor to the mean. The latter is the common representation of the covariates' distribution within Slope Units, which we also test and report in the supplements. Overall, we suggest to always investigate the whole distribution because the mean may not be the most informative nor the most performing way to generate Slope-Unit-based susceptibility models. In this general context, we generate our landslide inventory by combining semi-automated (OBIA) and manual mapping procedures. Our inventory, quantile covariates' representation and LASSO penalization produce excellent performances and interpretable relations between covariates and landslides.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Castro Camilo, Dr Daniela
Authors: Amato, G., Eisank, C., Castro-Camilo, D., and Lombardo, L.
College/School:College of Science and Engineering > School of Mathematics and Statistics > Statistics
Journal Name:Engineering Geology
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0013-7952
ISSN (Online):1872-6917
Published Online:01 August 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
First Published:First published in Engineering Geology 260: 105237
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record