Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure: Cochrane systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Taylor, R. S. , Long, L., Mordi, I. R., Tvilling Madsen, M., Davies, E. J., Dalal, H., Rees, K., Singh, S. J., Gluud, C. and Zwisler, A.-D. (2019) Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure: Cochrane systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. JACC: Heart Failure, 7(8), pp. 691-705. (doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.023) (PMID:31302050)

Taylor, R. S. , Long, L., Mordi, I. R., Tvilling Madsen, M., Davies, E. J., Dalal, H., Rees, K., Singh, S. J., Gluud, C. and Zwisler, A.-D. (2019) Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart failure: Cochrane systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. JACC: Heart Failure, 7(8), pp. 691-705. (doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.023) (PMID:31302050)

[img]
Preview
Text
191592.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

2MB

Abstract

Objectives: This study performed a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) for heart failure (HF). Background: There is an increasing call for trials of models of ExCR for patients with HF that provide alternatives to conventional center-based provision and recruitment of patients that reflect a broader HF population. Methods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched between January 2013 and January 2018. Randomized trials comparing patients undergoing ExCR to control patients not undergoing exercise were included. Study outcomes were pooled using meta-analysis. Metaregression examined potential effect modification according to ExCR program characteristics, and risk of bias, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were applied. Results: Across 44 trials (n = 5,783; median follow-up of 6 months), compared with control subjects, ExCR did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66 to 1.21; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.26 to 3.10) but did reduce all-cause hospitalization (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.83; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.54 to 0.92) and HF-specific hospitalization (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.84; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.14 for 2.46), and patients reported improved Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire overall scores (mean difference: −7.1; 95% CI: −10.5 to −3.7; TSA-adjusted CI: −13.2 to −1.0). No evidence of differential effects across different models of delivery, including center- versus home-based programs, were found. Conclusions: This review supports the beneficial effects of ExCR on patient outcomes. These benefits appear to be consistent across ExCR program characteristics. GRADE and TSA assessments indicated that further high-quality randomized trials are needed.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Taylor, Professor Rodney Stephen
Authors: Taylor, R. S., Long, L., Mordi, I. R., Tvilling Madsen, M., Davies, E. J., Dalal, H., Rees, K., Singh, S. J., Gluud, C., and Zwisler, A.-D.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > MRC/CSO Unit
Journal Name:JACC: Heart Failure
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:2213-1779
ISSN (Online):2213-1787
Published Online:10 July 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 The Authors
First Published:First published in JACC: Heart Failure
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons license

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record