Responsibility for another's wrong in Scotland: stick with Lister or twist with Mohamud?

Bogle, S. (2019) Responsibility for another's wrong in Scotland: stick with Lister or twist with Mohamud? Juridical Review, 2019(3), pp. 211-230.

[img] Text
189515.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 15 August 2020.

171kB

Abstract

Traces the interpretation and application of the law of vicarious liability in Scotland from the ruling in Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd (SC) to the ruling in Vaickuviene v J Sainsbury Plc (IH). Considers whether the Scottish courts should follow the approach laid down by the Inner House or follow Mohamud v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc (SC) when determining whether an act falls within the course of employment.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Bogle, Dr Stephen
Authors: Bogle, S.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:Juridical Review
Publisher:W. Green
ISSN:0022-6785
ISSN (Online):0022-6785
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 Sweet and Maxwell
First Published:First published in Juridical Review 2019(3):211-230
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record