What are mass media interventions made of? Exploring the active content of interventions designed to increase HIV testing in gay men within a systematic review

Flowers, P. , Riddell, J. , Boydell, N. , Teal, G., Coia, N. and McDaid, L. (2019) What are mass media interventions made of? Exploring the active content of interventions designed to increase HIV testing in gay men within a systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 24(3), pp. 704-737. (doi:10.1111/bjhp.12377) (PMID:31267624)

[img]
Preview
Text
186953.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

713kB

Abstract

Purpose: Mass media HIV testing interventions are effective in increasing testing, but there has been no examination of their theory or behaviour change technique (BCT) content. Within a heterogeneous body of studies with weak evaluative designs and differing outcomes, we attempted to gain useful knowledge to shape future interventions. Methods: Within a systematic review, following repeated requests to the authors of included studies for intervention materials, the Theory Coding Scheme, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTT) were used to extract data relating to active intervention content. Results: Of 19 studies, five reported an explicit theoretical basis to their intervention. TDF analysis highlighted the key domains employed within the majority of interventions: ‘knowledge’, ‘social roles and identities’, and ‘beliefs about consequences’. BCT analysis showed three BCT groupings commonly reported within interventions: ‘Comparison of outcomes’, ‘Natural consequences’, and ‘Shaping knowledge’. Three individual BCTs formed the backbone of most interventions and can be considered ‘standard’ content: ‘Instructions on how to perform behaviour’; ‘Credible source’; and ‘Information about health consequences’. Conclusions: This is the first study to examine and detail active intervention content in this field. It suggests future interventions should improve knowledge about testing, and use well‐branded and trusted sources that endorse testing. Future interventions should also provide clear information about the health benefits of testing. Our analysis also suggests that to improve levels of effectiveness characterizing the current field, it may be useful to elicit commitment, and action plans, relating to how to implement testing intentions.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Flowers, Professor Paul and Teal, Miss Gemma and Boydell, Dr Nicola and McDaid, Professor Lisa and Riddell, Miss Julie
Authors: Flowers, P., Riddell, J., Boydell, N., Teal, G., Coia, N., and McDaid, L.
College/School:College of Arts > School of Culture and Creative Arts > History of Art
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > MRC/CSO Unit
Journal Name:British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher:British Psychological Society
ISSN:1359-107X
ISSN (Online):2044-8287
Published Online:02 July 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 The Authors
First Published:First published in British Journal of Health Psychology 24(3): 704-737
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
727631SPHSU Core Renewal: Relationships & Health Improvement Research ProgrammeLisa McDaidMedical Research Council (MRC)MC_UU_12017/11IHW - MRC/CSO SPHU
SPHSU11
727641SPHSU Core Renewal: Setting and Health Improvement Research ProgrammeKathryn HuntMedical Research Council (MRC)MC_UU_12017/12IHW - MRC/CSO SPHU
SPHSU12