Labour Market and Wider Impacts of Benefit Sanctions: A Scoping Review [Review Protocol]

Pattaro, S. , Bailey, N. , Williams, E. , Gibson, M. , Wells, V. , Wright, S. , Tranmer, M. and Dibben, C. (2019) Labour Market and Wider Impacts of Benefit Sanctions: A Scoping Review [Review Protocol]. Documentation. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
Text
182309.pdf - Published Version

77kB

Abstract

The purpose of this protocol is to describe the rationale, aims, research questions and planned methodology of the scoping review. Broadly in line with Tricco et al. (2018) we have developed a detailed plan of action with a view to follow a clear, consistent and transparent process. The scoping review is envisaged as an exploratory exercise aimed at identifying and mapping existing national and international quantitative evidence on the intended and unintended impacts of benefit sanctions for people on unemployment and related benefits. This review is intended to identify the nature of the evidence base and key characteristics of studies which investigate the impacts of benefit sanctions. Furthermore, this review aims to investigate features of the research designs and methodological approaches adopted by the selected studies.

Item Type:Research Reports or Papers (Documentation)
Status:Unpublished
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Bailey, Professor Nick and Wells, Ms Valerie and Pattaro, Dr Serena and Tranmer, Professor Mark and Gibson, Dr Marcia and Williams, Dr Evan and Wright, Professor Sharon
Authors: Pattaro, S., Bailey, N., Williams, E., Gibson, M., Wells, V., Wright, S., Tranmer, M., and Dibben, C.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences
College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 The Authors
Publisher Policy:Reproduced with the permission of the author

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record