Heaney, M. T. and Rojas, F. (2011) The partisan dynamics of contention: demobilization of the antiwar movement in the United States, 2007-2009. Mobilization: an International Quarterly, 16(1), pp. 45-64.
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Publisher's URL: https://mobilizationjournal.org/doi/abs/10.17813/maiq.16.1.y8327n3nk0740677
Abstract
Changes in threats perceived by activists, partisan identification, and coalition brokerage are three mechanisms that help to explain the demobilization of the antiwar movement in the United States from 2007 to 2009. Drawing upon 5,398 surveys of demonstrators at antiwar protests, interviews with movement leaders, and ethnographic observation, this article argues that the antiwar movement demobilized as Democrats, who had been motivated to participate by anti-Republican sentiments, withdrew from antiwar protests when the Democratic Party achieved electoral success, if not policy success in ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The withdrawal of Democratic activists changed the character of the antiwar movement by undermining broad coalitions in the movement and encouraging the formation of smaller, more radical coalitions. While the election of Barack Obama had been heralded as a victory for the antiwar movement, Obama's election, in fact, thwarted the ability of the movement to achieve critical mass.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Heaney, Dr Michael |
Authors: | Heaney, M. T., and Rojas, F. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences |
Journal Name: | Mobilization: an International Quarterly |
Publisher: | San Diego State University Department of Sociology |
ISSN: | 1086-671X |
ISSN (Online): | 1938-1514 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record