Stimulus-driven brain rhythms within the alpha band: the attentional-modulation conundrum

Keitel, C. , Keitel, A. , Benwell, C. S.Y., Daube, C., Thut, G. and Gross, J. (2019) Stimulus-driven brain rhythms within the alpha band: the attentional-modulation conundrum. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(16), pp. 3119-3129. (doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1633-18.2019) (PMID:30770401) (PMCID:PMC6468105)

[img]
Preview
Text
178800.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

1MB

Abstract

Two largely independent research lines use rhythmic sensory stimulation to study visual processing. Despite the use of strikingly similar experimental paradigms, they differ crucially in their notion of the stimulus-driven periodic brain responses: One regards them mostly as synchronised (entrained) intrinsic brain rhythms; the other assumes they are predominantly evoked responses (classically termed steady-state responses, or SSRs) that add to the ongoing brain activity. This conceptual difference can produce contradictory predictions about, and interpretations of, experimental outcomes. The effect of spatial attention on brain rhythms in the alpha-band (8 -- 13 Hz) is one such instance: alpha-range SSRs have typically been found to increase in power when participants focus their spatial attention on laterally presented stimuli, in line with a gain control of the visual evoked response. In nearly identical experiments, retinotopic decreases in entrained alpha-band power have been reported, in line with the inhibitory function of intrinsic alpha. Here we reconcile these contradictory findings by showing that they result from a small but far-reaching difference between two common approaches to EEG spectral decomposition. In a new analysis of previously published human EEG data, recorded during bilateral rhythmic visual stimulation, we find the typical SSR gain effect when emphasising stimulus-locked neural activity and the typical retinotopic alpha suppression when focusing on ongoing rhythms. These opposite but parallel effects suggest that spatial attention may bias the neural processing of dynamic visual stimulation via two complementary neural mechanisms.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Keitel, Dr Anne and Benwell, Mr Christopher and Thut, Professor Gregor and Keitel, Dr Christian and Gross, Professor Joachim and Daube, Christoph
Authors: Keitel, C., Keitel, A., Benwell, C. S.Y., Daube, C., Thut, G., and Gross, J.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology
Journal Name:Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher:The Society for Neuroscience
ISSN:0270-6474
ISSN (Online):1529-2401
Published Online:15 February 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 Keitel et al.
First Published:First published in Journal of Neuroscience 39(16): 3119-3129
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License
Data DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/APSYF

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
597051Natural and modulated neural communication: State-dependent decoding and driving of human Brain Oscillations.Joachim GrossWellcome Trust (WELLCOTR)098433/Z/12/ZINP - CENTRE FOR COGNITIVE NEUROIMAGING
597911Natural and modulated neural communication: State-dependent decoding and driving of human Brain OscillationsGregor ThutWellcome Trust (WELLCOTR)098434/Z/12/ZINP - CENTRE FOR COGNITIVE NEUROIMAGING