Residuality and inconsistency in the interpretation of socio-theoretical systems

Bouzanis, C. and Kemp, S. (2019) Residuality and inconsistency in the interpretation of socio-theoretical systems. Sociological Theory, 37(3), pp. 282-292. (doi: 10.1177/0735275119869973)

[img]
Preview
Text
173878.pdf - Accepted Version

381kB

Abstract

This article addresses the interpretation and criticism of theoretical systems. Its particular focus is on how to assess the success of theories in dealing with some specific phenomenon. We are interested in how to differentiate between cases where a theory offers an unsatisfactory acknowledgement of a specified phenomenon and those where a theory offers a deeper, more systematic understanding. We address these meta-theoretical issues by developing Parsons’s analysis of positive and residual categories in various respects including a focus on mutual support as the basis of positivity, differentiating synectic (reconcilable) and antinomic (irreconcilable) residual categories, and distinguishing divisions that are central to systems from those between centre and periphery. We also consider how this conceptual toolkit can be put into practice.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Bouzanis, Dr Christoforos
Authors: Bouzanis, C., and Kemp, S.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance
Journal Name:Sociological Theory
Publisher:SAGE Publications
ISSN:0735-2751
ISSN (Online):1467-9558
Published Online:29 August 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © American Sociological Association 2019
First Published:First published in Sociological Theory 37(3):282-292
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record