Simion, M. (2019) A puzzle for epistemic WAMs. Synthese, 196(11), pp. 4679-4689. (doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-1681-3)
|
Text
172230.pdf - Accepted Version 367kB |
Abstract
In recent literature, a very popular position about the normativity of assertion claims that standards for epistemically proper assertion vary with practical context, while standards for knowledge do not. This paper shows this claim is strongly incompatible with the received value-theoretic view regarding the relationship between the axiological and the deontic: one of the two has to go.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Simion, Professor Mona |
Authors: | Simion, M. |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Research Group: | Cogito |
Journal Name: | Synthese |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISSN: | 0039-7857 |
ISSN (Online): | 1573-0964 |
Published Online: | 16 January 2018 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature |
First Published: | First published in Synthese 196(11): 4679-4689 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record