Capitalist outcomes, ideal types, historical realities

Davidson, N. (2019) Capitalist outcomes, ideal types, historical realities. Historical Materialism, (Accepted for Publication)

[img] Text
172151.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only



This article is a response to some of the criticisms made of How Revolutionary were the Bourgeois Revolutions? by Gerstenberger, Post and Riley. In particular, it focuses on two issues of definition – that of capitalism and the capitalist nation-state – which arise from the book’s ‘consequentialist’ claim that bourgeois revolutions are defined by a particular outcome: the establishment of nation-states dedicated to the accumulation of capital.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Accepted for Publication
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Davidson, Mr Neil
Authors: Davidson, N.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Sociology Anthropology and Applied Social Sciences
Journal Name:Historical Materialism
ISSN (Online):1569-206X

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record