Pieraccini, M. and Cardwell, E. (2016) Towards deliberative and pragmatic co-management: a comparison between inshore fisheries authorities in England and Scotland. Environmental Politics, 25(4), pp. 729-748. (doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1090372)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
In seeking to answer the question ‘who should be included in fisheries co-management?’, a constructive critique of the existing co-management literature is provided by filling the gaps of Habermas’s deliberative theory of democracy with Dewey’s pragmatism. Three conditions for ensuring democratic co-management are extrapolated from the theories: actors’ authority over decision making (empowerment), actors’ diversity (membership), and the right to self-nomination (procedures for external inclusion). The theoretical insights developed are supported with two examples of co-management institutions for inshore fisheries in the UK: Scottish Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) and English Inshore Fisheries Conservation Authorities (IFCAs).
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Cardwell, Dr Emma |
Authors: | Pieraccini, M., and Cardwell, E. |
College/School: | College of Science and Engineering > School of Geographical and Earth Sciences |
Journal Name: | Environmental Politics |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) |
ISSN: | 0964-4016 |
ISSN (Online): | 1743-8934 |
Published Online: | 30 September 2015 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record