The irony of just war?

O'Driscoll, C. (2018) The irony of just war? Ethics and International Affairs, 32(2), pp. 227-236. (doi: 10.1017/S0892679418000321)

[img]
Preview
Text
160896.pdf - Accepted Version

494kB

Abstract

By claiming that “just war is just war,” critics suggest that just war theory both distracts from and sanitizes the horror of modern warfare by dressing it up in the language of moral principles. However, the phrase can also be taken as a reminder of why we need just war theory in the first place. It is precisely because just war is just war, with all that this implies, that we must think so carefully and so judiciously about it. Of course, one could argue that the rump of just war scholarship over the past decade has been characterized by disinterest regarding the material realities of warfare. But is this still the case? This essay examines a series of benchmark books on the ethics of war published over the past year. All three exemplify an effort to grapple with the hard facts of modern violent conflict, and they all skillfully bring diverse traditions of just war thinking into conversation with one another.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:O'Driscoll, Professor Cian
Authors: O'Driscoll, C.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Ethics and International Affairs
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:0892-6794
ISSN (Online):1747-7093
Published Online:08 June 2018
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2018 Cambridge Council for Ethics in International Affairs
First Published:First published in Ethics and International Affairs 32(2): 227-236
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record