Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment

Ryan, C., Hesselgreaves, H., Wu, O. , Paul, J. , Dixon-Hughes, J. and Moss, J. G. (2018) Protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient experiences of central venous access devices in anti-cancer treatment. Systematic Reviews, 7, 61. (doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0721-x) (PMID:29669583)

[img]
Preview
Text
159997.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

410kB

Abstract

Background: Three types of central venous access devices (CVADs)—peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), skin-tunnelled central catheters (Hickman-type devices), and implantable chest wall Ports (Ports)—are routinely used in the intravenous administration of anti-cancer treatment. These devices avoid the need for peripheral cannulation and allow for home delivery of treatment. Assessments of these devices have tended to focus on medical and economic factors, but there is increased interest in the importance of patient experiences and perspectives in this area. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise existing research regarding patient experiences of these CVADs to help clinicians guide, prepare, and support patients receiving CVADs for the administration of anti-cancer treatment. Method: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL research databases will be carried out along with a supplementary reference list search. This review will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in peer-review journals, reporting some aspect(s) of patient experiences or perspectives regarding the use of PICC, Hickman, or Port CVADs for the administration of anti-cancer drugs. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included papers will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Relevant outcome data will be extracted from included studies and analysed using a thematic synthesis approach. Discussion: The results section of the review will comprise thematic synthesis of quantitative studies, thematic synthesis of qualitative studies, and the aggregation of the two. Results will aim to offer an account of current understandings of patient experiences and perspective regarding PICC, Hickman-type, and Port devices in the context of anti-cancer treatment. Confidence in cumulative evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Paul, Mr James and Ryan, Dr Caoimhe and Moss, Professor Jonathan and Dixon, Miss Judith and Hesselgreaves, Dr Hannah and Wu, Professor Olivia
Authors: Ryan, C., Hesselgreaves, H., Wu, O., Paul, J., Dixon-Hughes, J., and Moss, J. G.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Cancer Sciences
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment
Journal Name:Systematic Reviews
Publisher:BioMed Central Ltd
ISSN:2046-4053
ISSN (Online):2046-4053
Published Online:18 April 2018
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2018 The Authors
First Published:First published in Systematic Reviews 7:61
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record