Adding small species to the big picture: species distribution modelling in an age of landscape scale conservation

Eaton, S. , Ellis, C., Genney, D., Thompson, R., Yahr, R. and Haydon, D. T. (2018) Adding small species to the big picture: species distribution modelling in an age of landscape scale conservation. Biological Conservation, 217, pp. 251-258. (doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.012)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

A recent shift in conservation policy from the site scale to the ecosystem or landscape scale requires underpinning by large-scale species distribution data. This poses a significant challenge in conserving small/less charismatic species (SLCS's) whose often cryptic nature can result in spatially restricted sampling, thus preventing landscape scale conservation projects from being realised for these ecologically important groups. Species distribution models (SDMs) can provide a powerful tool to bridge this gap. However, in the case of SLCS's (here lichen epiphytes in temperate rainforests of western Scotland are used as a model system), direct predictor variables exist at micro-scales (millimetres to centimetres), which are not extensively available in landscape-scale datasets. Here we identify a group of well-mapped larger-scale ‘compound variables’ which capture the effect of multiple direct predictors (such as bark pH and topography), and test whether they can be successfully used to predict species distributions at the landscape scale, circumventing the need for direct (micro-scale) predictor data. By testing the SDMs more widely within western Scotland, accurate predictions of species presence/absence could be made throughout the region for 5 of the 9 lichen epiphytes, making these SDMs extremely valuable as a conservation planning tool. Species distribution models utilising compound variables as predictors offer a solution to the paucity of species distributional data for SLCS's, and present a valuable resource in conservation planning for such species. The importance of testing the SDMs outside of a training region to prevent prediction error is highlighted however.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This project was supported by grants from Scottish Natural Heritage (grant number 14503) and Forestry Commission Scotland.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Haydon, Professor Daniel and Eaton, Sally
Authors: Eaton, S., Ellis, C., Genney, D., Thompson, R., Yahr, R., and Haydon, D. T.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Life Sciences
Journal Name:Biological Conservation
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0006-3207
Published Online:20 November 2017

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record