Cleland, J.G.F. , Pennell, D.J., Ray, S.G., Coats, A.J., Macfarlane, P.W., Murray, G.D., Mule, J.D., Vered, Z. and Lahiri, A. (2003) Myocardial viability as a determinant of the ejection fraction response to Carvedilol in patients with heart failure (CHRISTMAS trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 362(9377), pp. 14-21. (doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13801-9) (PMID:12853194)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
Background: The improvement in left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in response to β blockers is heterogeneous in patients with heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease, possibly indicating variations in the myocardial substrate underlying left-ventricular dysfunction. We investigated whether improvement in LVEF was associated with the volume of hibernating myocardium (viable myocardium with contractile failure). Methods: We did a double-blind, randomised trial to compare placebo and carvedilol for 6 months in individuals with stable, chronic heart failure due to ischaemic left-ventricular systolic dysfunction. We enrolled 489 patients, of whom 387 were randomised. Patients were designated hibernators or non-hibernators according to the volume of hibernating myocardium. The primary endpoint was change in LVEF, measured by radionuclide ventriculography, in hibernators versus non-hibernators, on carvedilol compared with placebo. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results: 82 patients dropped out of the study because of adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or failure to complete the investigation. Thus, 305 (79%) were analysed. LVEF was unchanged with placebo (mean change −0·4 [SE 0·9] and −0·4 [0·8] for non-hibernators and hibernators, respectively) but increased with carvedilol (2–5 [0·9] and 3–2 [0·8], respectively; p<0·0001 compared with baseline). Mean placebo-subtracted change in LVEF was 3·2% (95% CI 1–8–4–7; p=0·0001) overall, and 2·9% (0·7–5–1; p=0·011) and 3·6% (1–7–5–4; p=0·0002) in non-hibernators and hibernators, respectively. Effect of hibernator status on response of LVEF to carvedilol was not significant (0·7 [−2·2 to 3–5]; p=0·644). However, patients with more myocardium affected by hibernation or by hibernation and ischaemia had a greater increase in LVEF on carvedilol (p=0·0002 and p=0·009, respectively). Interpretation: Some of the effect of carvedilol on LVEF might be mediated by improved function of hibernating or ischaemic myocardium, or both. Medical treatment might be an important adjunct or alternative to revascularisation for patients with hibernating myocardium.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Macfarlane, Professor Peter and Cleland, Professor John |
| Authors: | Cleland, J.G.F., Pennell, D.J., Ray, S.G., Coats, A.J., Macfarlane, P.W., Murray, G.D., Mule, J.D., Vered, Z., and Lahiri, A. |
| College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences |
| Journal Name: | Lancet |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
| ISSN: | 0140-6736 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1474-547X |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
Deposit and Record Details