Rules versus judgement-based accounting disclosure in the UK

Garrod, N. and Emmanuel, C. (2004) Rules versus judgement-based accounting disclosure in the UK. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(6), pp. 441-455. (doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.10.002)

Abstract

In the wake of recent corporate debacles, considerable debate has ensued on the relative merits of rules-based versus judgement-based accounting disclosure. This note contributes to the debate by examining disclosure practices in the UK where a well-established regulatory framework nevertheless upholds the right of corporate managers to exercise discretion. A specific template is developed to examine simultaneously the content of the segment report and the operating and financial review (OFR) to detect disclosure patterns. The findings indicate that companies which provide the fullest and most relevant segment reports provide less voluntary additional disclosure in the OFR than those companies that, superficially, provide less extensive disclosure in their segment reports. It is unclear, therefore, that changes to more rules-based disclosure regimes will automatically lead to an increase in the level of overall disclosure.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Emmanuel, Prof Clive
• Authors: Garrod, N., and Emmanuel, C.
• College/School: College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance
• Journal Name: Journal of Accounting and Public Policy