Biomarker-guided versus guideline-based treatment of patients with heart failure: results from BIOSTAT-CHF

Ouwerkerk, W. et al. (2018) Biomarker-guided versus guideline-based treatment of patients with heart failure: results from BIOSTAT-CHF. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 71(4), pp. 386-398. (doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.041) (PMID:29389354)

Ouwerkerk, W. et al. (2018) Biomarker-guided versus guideline-based treatment of patients with heart failure: results from BIOSTAT-CHF. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 71(4), pp. 386-398. (doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.041) (PMID:29389354)

[img]
Preview
Text
151777.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

723kB

Abstract

Background: Heart failure guidelines recommend up-titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) to doses used in randomized clinical trials, but these recommended doses are often not reached. Up-titration may, however, not be necessary in all patients. Objectives: This study sought to establish the role of blood biomarkers to determine which patients should or should not be up-titrated. Methods: Clinical outcomes of 2,516 patients with worsening heart failure from the BIOSTAT-CHF (BIOlogy Study to Tailored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure) were compared between 3 theoretical treatment scenarios: scenario A, in which all patients are up-titrated to >50% of recommended doses; scenario B, in which patients are up-titrated according to a biomarker-based treatment selection model; and scenario C, in which no patient is up-titrated to >50% of recommended doses. The study conducted multivariable Cox regression using 161 biomarkers and their interaction with treatment, weighted for treatment-indication bias to estimate the expected number of deaths or heart failure hospitalizations at 24 months for all 3 scenarios. Results: Estimated death or hospitalization rates in 1,802 patients with available (bio)markers were 16%, 16%, and 26%, respectively, in the ACE inhibitor/ARB up-titration scenarios A, B, and C. Similar rates for beta-blocker and MRA up-titration scenarios A, B, and C were 23%, 19%, and 24%, and 12%, 11%, and 24%, respectively. If up-titration was successful in all patients, an estimated 9.8, 1.3, and 12.3 events per 100 treated patients could be prevented at 24 months by ACE inhibitor/ARB, beta-blocker, and MRA therapy, respectively. Similar numbers were 9.9, 4.7, and 13.1 if up-titration treatment decision was based on a biomarker-based treatment selection model. Conclusions: Up-titrating patients with heart failure based on biomarker values might have resulted in fewer deaths or hospitalizations compared with a hypothetical scenario in which all patients were successfully up-titrated.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This work was supported by a grant from the European Commission [FP7-242209-BIOSTAT-CHF; EudraCT 2010-020808-29]
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Cleland, Professor John
Authors: Ouwerkerk, W., Zwinderman, A. H., Ng, L. L., Demissei, B., Hillege, H. L., Zannad, F., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Samani, N. J., Ponikowski, P., Metra, M., ter Maaten, J. M., Lang, C. C., van der Harst, P., Filippatos, G., Dickstein, K., Cleland, J. G., Anker, S. D., and Voors, A. A.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > Robertson Centre
Journal Name:Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0735-1097
ISSN (Online):1558-3597
Published Online:22 January 2018
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2018 The American College of Cardiology Foundation
First Published:First published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology 71(4):386-398
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record