Oxidative stress, activity behaviour and body mass in captive parrots

Larcombe, S.D., Tregaskes, C.A., Coffey, J., Stevenson, A.E., Alexander, L.G. and Arnold, K.E. (2015) Oxidative stress, activity behaviour and body mass in captive parrots. Conservation Physiology, 3(1), cov045. (doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov045) (PMID:27293729) (PMCID:PMC4778434)

Abstract

Many parrot species are kept in captivity for conservation, but often show poor reproduction, health and survival. These traits are known to be influenced by oxidative stress, the imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ability of antioxidant defences to ameliorate ROS damage. In humans, oxidative stress is linked with obesity, lack of exercise and poor nutrition, all of which are common in captive animals. Here, we tested whether small parrots (budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus ) maintained in typical pet cages and on ad libitum food varied in oxidative profile, behaviour and body mass. Importantly, as with many birds held in captivity, they did not have enough space to engage in extensive free flight. Four types of oxidative damage, single-stranded DNA breaks (low-pH comet assay), alkali-labile sites in DNA (high-pH comet assay), sensitivity of DNA to ROS (H 2 O 2 -treated comet assay) and malondialdehyde (a byproduct of lipid peroxidation), were uncorrelated with each other and with plasma concentrations of dietary antioxidants. Without strenuous exercise over 28 days in a relatively small cage, more naturally ‘active’ individuals had more single-stranded DNA breaks than sedentary birds. High body mass at the start or end of the experiment, coupled with substantial mass gain, were all associated with raised sensitivity of DNA to ROS. Thus, high body mass in these captive birds was associated with oxidative damage. These birds were not lacking dietary antioxidants, because final body mass was positively related to plasma levels of retinol, zeaxanthin and α-tocopherol. Individuals varied widely in activity levels, feeding behaviour, mass gain and oxidative profile despite standardized living conditions. DNA damage is often associated with poor immunocompetence, low fertility and faster ageing. Thus, we have candidate mechanisms for the limited lifespan and fecundity common to many birds kept for conservation purposes.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Arnold, Dr Kathryn and Larcombe, Dr Stephen
• Authors: Larcombe, S.D., Tregaskes, C.A., Coffey, J., Stevenson, A.E., Alexander, L.G., and Arnold, K.E.
• College/School: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
• Journal Name: Conservation Physiology
• Publisher: Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology
• ISSN: 2051-1434
• ISSN (Online): 2051-1434
• Published Online: 20 October 2015
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2015 The Authors
• First Published: First published in Conservation Physiology 3(1):cov045
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons License