Effects of serelaxin on the outcome of patients with or without substantial peripheral edema: a subgroup analysis from the RELAX-AHF trial

Gimpelewicz, C. et al. (2017) Effects of serelaxin on the outcome of patients with or without substantial peripheral edema: a subgroup analysis from the RELAX-AHF trial. American Heart Journal, 190, pp. 113-122. (doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.012)

[img]
Preview
Text
142011.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

1MB

Abstract

Background: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a heterogeneous disorder with most of the patients presenting with breathlessness along with varying degrees of peripheral edema. The presence of peripheral edema suggests that volume overload is the cause of decompensation leading to AHF, while breathlessness in the absence of edema may reflect a “vascular phenotype”. This analysis investigated the characteristics, therapeutic response and outcome of patients with AHF, with and without overt peripheral edema in the RELAX-AHF trial. Methods: Physician-assessed edema scores at baseline were used to categorize the population into those with no /mild edema (score 0 or 1+) and moderate/severe edema (score 2+ or 3+). The effect of serelaxin versus placebo was assessed within each subgroup. Results: Patients with moderate/severe edema (n = 583; 50.5%) were more likely to have severe dyspnea, orthopnea (>30 degrees), rales (≥1/3) and elevated jugular venous pressure (>6 cm) than the patients with little or no peripheral edema (n=571; 49.5%) The relative benefits of serelaxin in terms of reduction in breathlessness, lower diuretic requirements, decreased length of initial hospital stay and days in ICU/CCU, and improved prognosis (180-day cardiovascular and all-cause mortality) were generally similar for patients with or without peripheral edema. However, as patients with moderate/severe peripheral edema had worse outcomes, the absolute benefit was generally greater than in patients with no/mild edema. Conclusions: Overall, patients with AHF and moderate/severe peripheral edema have a worse prognosis but appear to receive similar relative benefit and perhaps greater absolute benefit from serelaxin administration.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:The RELAX-AHF study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Cleland, Professor John
Authors: Gimpelewicz, C., Metra, M., Cleland, J. G.F., Szecsödy, P., Chang Wun, C.-C., Boer-Martins, L., Cotter, G., Davison, B. A., Felker, G. M., Filippatos, G., Greenberg, B. H., Pang, P., Ponikowski, P., Severin, T., Voors, A. A., and Teerlink, J. R.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > Robertson Centre
Journal Name:American Heart Journal
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0002-8703
ISSN (Online):1097-6744
Published Online:27 May 2017
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc.
First Published:First published in American Heart Journal 190:113-122
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record