Do 'contextualist cases' support contextualism?

Kelp, C. (2012) Do 'contextualist cases' support contextualism? Erkenntnis, 76(1), pp. 115-120. (doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9330-y)

Kelp, C. (2012) Do 'contextualist cases' support contextualism? Erkenntnis, 76(1), pp. 115-120. (doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9330-y)

[img]
Preview
Text
140945.pdf - Accepted Version

255kB

Abstract

This paper addresses the argument from ‘contextualist cases’—such as for instance DeRose’s Bank cases—to attributor contextualism. It is argued that these cases do not make a decisive case against invariantism and that the debate between contextualists and invariantists will have to be settled on broader theoretical grounds.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Kelp, Dr Christoph
Authors: Kelp, C.
Subjects:B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
College/School:College of Arts > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Journal Name:Erkenntnis
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0165-0106
ISSN (Online):1572-8420
Published Online:20 October 2011
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media
First Published:First published in Erkenntnis 76(1): 115-120
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record