Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping and T2-weighted dark-blood imaging for the infarct-related coronary artery in Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Layland, J. et al. (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping and T2-weighted dark-blood imaging for the infarct-related coronary artery in Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(4), e004759. (doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.004759) (PMID:28364045) (PMCID:PMC5532996)

[img]
Preview
Text
136378.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

1MB

Abstract

Background: Patients with recent non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. Methods and Results: We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2‐weighted short tau inversion recovery [T2W‐STIR]) magnetic resonance imaging methods for imaging the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in 73 patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (mean age 57±10 years, 78% male) at 3.0‐T magnetic resonance imaging within 6.5±3.5 days of invasive management. The infarct‐related territory was identified independently using a combination of angiographic, ECG, and clinical findings. The presence and extent of infarction was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement imaging (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg). The extent of acutely injured myocardium was independently assessed with native T1, T2, and T2W‐STIR methods. The mean infarct size was 5.9±8.0% of left ventricular mass. The infarct zone T1 and T2 times were 1323±68 and 57±5 ms, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies of T1 and T2 mapping for identification of the infarct‐related artery were similar (P=0.125), and both were superior to T2W‐STIR (P<0.001). The extent of myocardial injury (percentage of left ventricular volume) estimated with T1 (15.8±10.6%) and T2 maps (16.0±11.8%) was similar (P=0.838) and moderately well correlated (r=0.82, P<0.001). Mean extent of acute injury estimated with T2W‐STIR (7.8±11.6%) was lower than that estimated with T1 (P<0.001) or T2 maps (P<0.001). Conclusions: In patients with non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping have higher diagnostic performance than T2W‐STIR for identifying the infarct‐related artery. Compared with conventional STIR, T1 and T2 maps have superior value to inform diagnosis and revascularization planning in non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02073422.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Mccomb, Dr Christie and Lee, Matthew and Carrick, Dr David and Rauhalammi, Mr Samuli and Oldroyd, Dr Keith and Layland, Dr Jamie and Mangion, Dr Kenneth and Berry, Professor Colin and McClure, Dr John and Radjenovic, Dr Aleksandra
Authors: Layland, J., Rauhalammi, S., Lee, M. M.Y., Ahmed, N., Carberry, J., Teng Yue May, V., Watkins, S., McComb, C., Mangion, K., McClure, J. D., Carrick, D., O'Donnell, A., Sood, A., McEntegart, M., Oldroyd, K. G., Radjenovic, A., and Berry, C.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences
Journal Name:Journal of the American Heart Association
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:2047-9980
ISSN (Online):2047-9980
Published Online:31 March 2017
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2017 The Authors
First Published:First published in Journal of the American Heart Association 6(4): e004759
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
575371Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiographically Guided Management to Optimise Outcomes in Unstable Coronary Syndromes: a Developmental Clinical StudyColin BerryBritish Heart Foundation (BHF)PG/11/55/28999RI CARDIOVASCULAR & MEDICAL SCIENCES