(In)securitization and illiberal practices on the fringe of the EU

Skleparis, D. (2016) (In)securitization and illiberal practices on the fringe of the EU. European Security, 25(1), pp. 92-111. (doi: 10.1080/09662839.2015.1080160)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Illiberal practices of liberal regimes have been extensively studied by critical security studies. The literature on risk emphasises the idea of imminent dangers and the logic of worst-case scenarios, which eventually unsettle the balance between security and liberty by always favouring the former in its most coercive and exceptional forms. This paper, by drawing on (in)securitization theory, attempts to explain how particular illiberal practices with respect to the control and management of immigration on the fringe of the EU become normalised. It argues that (in)securitization of immigration and illiberal practices are effects of the very functioning of a transnational field of (in)security professionals that are produced through the structural competition between different actors of this field over the definition of security and the appropriate control and management of immigration. In this respect, it uses Greece as a case study and draws on material gathered through interviews with Greek security professionals in Athens, Lesvos, Orestiada, and Alexandroupoli, and analysis of their discourse in dissertations they prepared during their study in police academies.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Skleparis, Dr Dimitris
Authors: Skleparis, D.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:European Security
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0966-2839
ISSN (Online):1746-1545
Published Online:23 October 2015

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record