Aesthetics, death, and landmark structures: Approach for values clarification

Hutchings, D., Simpson, R., Stauffer, R. and Wahl, D. (2007) Aesthetics, death, and landmark structures: Approach for values clarification. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 13(1), pp. 1-8. (doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:1(1))

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

The Golden Gate Bridge is an iconic landmark, which has long held the distinction of being the most popular structure in the world to commit suicide. A general process is presented for policy makers’ use to generate conversation and clarify their values in making decisions about public works improvements. This applies particularly well where issues of aesthetics and cost are emotionally and politically charged. The Golden Gate Bridge serves as a case study of how this process can be used. Three design solutions were generated on the basis of architectural concerns and developed in the context of evaluation criteria. A value-based decision analysis approach was taken to determine the preference structure of decision makers involved and to provide a rational framework for further development. Results indicate that existing preferences among decision makers may not be consistent with their public decisions and could be clarified given a more rigorous framework. The do-nothing option is likely to be less preferred to other options given a thorough definition of the acceptance criteria.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Simpson, Dr Robert
Authors: Hutchings, D., Simpson, R., Stauffer, R., and Wahl, D.
College/School:College of Science and Engineering > School of Engineering > Infrastructure and Environment
Journal Name:Journal of Architectural Engineering
Publisher:American Society of Civil Engineers
ISSN:1076-0431
ISSN (Online):1943-5568
Published Online:01 March 2007

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record