Chalmers, J. and Leverick, F. (2016) Jury research in Scotland: a rejoinder. Criminal Law Review, 2016(12), pp. 924-930.
|
Text
130146.pdf - Accepted Version 513kB |
Abstract
Responds to an article by Cheryl Thomas in Crim. L.R. 2016, 12, 915-923, criticising the authors' earlier article "How should we go about jury research in Scotland?", Crim. L.R 2016, 10, 697-713, which discussed why jury research is needed and the methods available. Replies to Thomas's criticisms of their understanding of jury research methods and their findings on methods used to answer the questions of the Post-Corroboration Safeguards Review.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Chalmers, Professor James and Leverick, Professor Fiona |
| Authors: | Chalmers, J., and Leverick, F. |
| College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Law |
| Journal Name: | Criminal Law Review |
| Publisher: | Sweet and Maxwell |
| ISSN: | 0011-135X |
| Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2016 Sweet and Maxwell |
| First Published: | First published in Criminal Law Review 2016(12):924-930 |
| Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
Deposit and Record Details