Reafferent or redundant: integration of phonotaxis and optomotor behavior in crickets and robots

Webb, B. and Reeve, R. (2003) Reafferent or redundant: integration of phonotaxis and optomotor behavior in crickets and robots. Adaptive Behavior, 11(3), pp. 137-158. (doi:10.1177/1059712303113001)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

A general problem in understanding the mechanisms underlying animal behavior is the integration or interaction of different sensorimotor systems. Webb and Harrison (2000a, b) investigated the addition of an optomotor reflex to a sound-localizing robot modeled on cricket behavior. Böhm, Schildberger, and Huber (1991) proposed a simple additive mechanism to explain how the cricket combines the two behaviors. Problems implementing this on the robot led us to propose an alternative inhibition mechanism, which proved effective. Here we directly compare these two possibilities and several further alternatives. First, in a simulation of the open-loop paradigm used by Böhm et al. we demonstrate that there are at least five algorithms (including “efferent copy”) that may adequately account for the data they present. We then consider possible neural implementations of several of these schemes, and test them in robot experiments. The results suggest that inhibition is both neurally plausible and effective as a means of combining these behaviors in real sensorimotor situations.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Reeve, Dr Richard
Authors: Webb, B., and Reeve, R.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
Journal Name:Adaptive Behavior
Publisher:SAGE
ISSN:1059-7123
ISSN (Online):1741-2633

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record