Carrick, D. et al. (2016) Comparative prognostic utility of indexes of microvascular function alone or in combination in patients with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation, 134(23), pp. 1833-1847. (doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022603) (PMID:27803036) (PMCID:PMC5131697)
|
Text
129722.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 969kB |
Abstract
Background—Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is frequently successful at restoring coronary artery blood flow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, however, failed myocardial reperfusion commonly passes undetected in up to half of these patients. The index of microvascular resistance (IMR) is a novel invasive measure of coronary microvascular function. We aimed to investigate the pathological and prognostic significance of an index of microvascular resistance (IMR>40), alone or in combination with a coronary flow reserve (CFR≤2.0), in the culprit artery after emergency PCI for acute STEMI. Methods—Patients with acute STEMI were prospectively enrolled during emergency PCI, and categorized according to IMR (≤40 or >40) and CFR (≤2.0 or >2.0). Cardiac MRI was acquired 2 days and 6 months post-MI. All-cause death or first heart failure hospitalization was a pre-specified outcome (median follow-up duration 845 days). Results—IMR and CFR were measured in the culprit artery at the end of PCI in 283 STEMI patients (mean age 60 (12) years, 73% male). The median [interquartile range] IMR and CFR were 25 [15-48] and 1.6 [1.1-2.1], respectively. An IMR>40 was a multivariable associate of myocardial hemorrhage (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 2.10 (1.03, 4.27); p=0.042. An IMR>40 was closely associated with microvascular obstruction. Symptom to reperfusion time, TIMI blush grade, and no (≤30%) ST segment resolution, were not associated with these pathologies. An IMR>40 was a multivariable associate of the changes in LV ejection fraction (coefficient (95% CI) (-2.12 (-4.02, -0.23); p=0.028) and LV end-diastolic volume (7.85 (0.41, 15.29); p=0.039) at 6 months, independent of infarct size. An IMR>40 (odds ratio 4.36 (95% CI 2.10, 9.06); p<0.001) was a multivariable associate of all-cause death or heart failure. Compared with an IMR>40, the combination of IMR>40 with CFR≤2.0 did not have incremental prognostic value. Conclusions—An IMR>40 is a multivariable associate of LV and clinical outcomes post-STEMI, independent of the size of infarction. Compared with standard clinical measures of the efficacy of myocardial reperfusion, including the ischemic time, ST-segment elevation, the angiographic blush grade and CFR, IMR has superior clinical value for risk stratification and may be considered as a reference test for failed myocardial reperfusion.
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Altmetric
Altmetric