Academic performance, publishing and peer review: peering into the twilight zone

Guthrie, J., Parker, L. D. and Dumay, J. (2015) Academic performance, publishing and peer review: peering into the twilight zone. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(1), pp. 2-13. (doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2014-1871)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of published research access and peer review, considering their impacts on accounting scholarship. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on literature and publishing document review, experiential reflections and argument. Findings – The authors reveal changes in publishing formats and accessibility, the challenges of managing research quality and significance and the challenges of avoiding constraint and foreclosure of significant new knowledge and its effective dissemination. Research limitations/implications – This paper discusses the research and publishing community’s opening to new, flexible opportunities for knowledge creation and dissemination. Originality/value – The discussion challenges the status quo of traditional academic journal publication and points to an innovative future.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Parker, Professor Lee
Authors: Guthrie, J., Parker, L. D., and Dumay, J.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Accounting and Finance
Journal Name:Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN:0951-3574

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record