Cloonan, M. (2016) Negotiating needletime: the Musicians' Union, the BBC and the record companies, c. 1920-1990. Social History, 41(4), pp. 353-374. (doi: 10.1080/03071022.2016.1215098)
|
Text
124086.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB |
Abstract
This article examines an important, but hitherto largely overlooked, licensing system which operated in the UK between the late 1920s and late 1980s and limited the amount of recorded music that broadcasters could use in radio progammes. Known as ‘needletime’ the system was formalized in the 1930s when the BBC reached a collective agreement with the UK’s record companies – here acting via the copyright licensing society Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) – about the amount of records that it could play. Drawing on previously unused materials, the article provides a revisionist account of the development of needletime, focusing on the actions of a third party, the Musicians’ Union (MU). As is shown, the MU was able to exercise influence on both camps and thus to have a profound impact on the development of music radio and the wider music industries in the UK. Previous accounts of needletime are critiqued and it is suggested that, while it was accused of operating ‘restrictive practices’, the MU’s role can be seen more as an attempt to ensure that the suitably remunerated employment of musicians was as widespread as possible. Needletime emerges as perhaps the key agreement thus far within the UK’s music industries’ industrial relations.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Cloonan, Professor Martin |
Authors: | Cloonan, M. |
College/School: | College of Arts > School of Culture and Creative Arts > Music |
Journal Name: | Social History |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
ISSN: | 0307-1022 |
ISSN (Online): | 1470-1200 |
Published Online: | 11 October 2016 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2016 The Author |
First Published: | First published in Social History 41(4): 353-374 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons License |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record