I limiti materiali e riflessivi della sociologia costituzionale = Material and reflexive limits of the sociology of constitutions

Goldoni, M. (2016) I limiti materiali e riflessivi della sociologia costituzionale = Material and reflexive limits of the sociology of constitutions. Quaderni Costituzionali, 2016(3), pp. 541-566. (doi: 10.1439/84268)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Publisher's URL: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1439/84268

Abstract

Globalization has brought about a resurgence of the sociological study of constitutions. This article engages with this renaissance in a critical way. First, it pinpoints the antecedents of a sociological approach to constitutions, with a focus on the work of Niklas Luh mann. Second, it analyses two of the most important contemporary contributions to the sociology of constitutions, that is, those of Gunther Teubner and Chris Thornhill. Finally, it acknowledges the importance of a sociological understanding of constitutions, but offers two arguments for abandoning functionalism and taking up a more material approach.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Goldoni, Professor Marco
Authors: Goldoni, M.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:Quaderni Costituzionali
Publisher:Societa Editrice Il Mulino
ISSN:0392-6664

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record