The purpose of rating quality of evidence differs in an overview, as compared to guidelines or recommendations

Pollock, A., Brady, M. C., Farmer, S. E., Langhorne, P. , Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., Wiffen, P. J. and van Wijck, F. (2016) The purpose of rating quality of evidence differs in an overview, as compared to guidelines or recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, pp. 238-240. (doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.001) (PMID:26769255)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

No abstract available.

Item Type:Articles (Letter)
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Langhorne, Professor Peter
Authors: Pollock, A., Brady, M. C., Farmer, S. E., Langhorne, P., Mead, G. E., Mehrholz, J., Wiffen, P. J., and van Wijck, F.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences
Journal Name:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0895-4356
Published Online:06 January 2016

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record