Agrawala, S. (1999). Early science–policy interactions in climate change: Lessons from the advisory group on greenhouse gases. Global Environmental Change, 9(2):157–169.
Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4):543–571.
Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4):1044–1074.
Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. The University of Chicago Press.
Berardo, R. (2009). Generalized trust in multi-organizational policy arenas: Studying its emergence from a network perspective. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1):178–189.
Berardo, R., Lubell, M., and Scholz, J. T. (2013). Who participates in an ecology of games and why? A comparison across weakly and strongly institutionalized policy-making systems. Paper presented at 2013 MPSA meeting, Chicago.
Bogason, P. and Musso, J. A. (2006). The democratic prospects of network governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1):3–18.
Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon – On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76(2):253–273.
Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3):337–369.
Braun, D. (1993). Who governs intermediary agencies? Principal-agent relations in research policy-making. Journal of Public Policy, 13(2):135–135.
Busch, A. (2009). Politikwissenschaft und Politikberatung: Reflektionen anlässlich der aktuellen Krise. Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, 2(3):467–484.
Bächtiger, A. and Hangartner, D. (2010). When deliberative theory meets empirical political science: Theoretical and methodological challenges in political deliberation. Political Studies, 58:609–629.
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., and Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2):8–19.
Choi, T. and Robertson, P. J. (2014). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Forthcoming.
Crona, B. I. and Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17(1):32–50.
Damro, C. (2006). The new trade politics and EU competition policy: Shopping for convergence and co-operation. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6):867–886.
DiMaggio, P. J., Powell W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48:147-160.
Dutton, W., Schneider, V., and Vedel, T. (2012). Ecologies of Games Shaping Large Technical Systems: Cases from Telecommunications to the Internet, pages 49–68. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
Dutton, W. H. (1995). The ecology of games and its enemies. Communication Theory, 5(4):397–392.
Edelenbos, J., Schie, N., and Gerrits, L. (2010). Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance. Policy Sciences, 43(1):73–94.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22:1–29.
Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3):397–425.
Feiock, R. C. and Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-Organizing Governance of Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas, pages 3–26. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge / New York.
Feldman, M. S. and Khademian, A. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance, 20(2):305–324.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30:441–473.
Gollier, C. and Treich, N. (2003). Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: The economics of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1):77–103.
Gornitzka, Å. and Sverdrup, U. (2008). Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(4):725–750.
Graz, J.-C. (2003): How Powerful are Transnational Elite Clubs? The Social Myth of the World Economic Forum. New Political Economy 8(3): 321-340.
Gulbrandsen, M. (2011). Research institutes as hybrid organizations: Central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy Sciences, 44:215–230.
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4):399–408.
Habermas, J., Lennox, S., and Lennox, F. (1964). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). In Bonner, S. E. and Kellner, D., editors, Critical Theory and Society: A Reader. Routledge, New York.
Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34(4):573–592.
Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36:175–195.
Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44:936–957.
Hardy, S. D. and Koontz, T. M. (2009). Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. The Policy Studies Journal, 37:3.
Häusermann, S., Mach, A., and Papadopoulos, Y. (2004). From corporatism to partisan politics: Social policy making under strain in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 10(2):33–59.
Head, B. W. (2008). Assessing network-based collaborations: Effectiveness for whom? Public Management Review, 10(6):733–749.
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In King, A., editor, The New American Political System, pages 87–124. American Enterprise Institute.
Hendriks, C. M. (2005). Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums. Policy Sciences, 38:1–20.
Hendriks, C. M. (2006). When the forum meets interest politics: Strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics & Society, 34(4):571–602.
Hoberg, G. and Morawski, E. (2008). Policy change through sector intersection: Forest and aboriginal policy in Clayoquot Sound. Canadian Public Administration, 40(3):387–414.
Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy & Politics, 39(2):163–168.
Jamal, T. and Getz, D. (1999). Community roundtables for tourism-related conflicts: The dialectics of consensus and process structures. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3–4):290–313.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Jasanoff, S. (2011). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Jasanoff, S. S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17(2):195–230.
Joerges, C. and Neyer, J. (1997). From intergovernmental bargaining to deliberative political processes: The constitutionalisation of comitology. European Law Journal, 3(3):273–299.
Jones, M. D. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2009). Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1):37–58.
Kinzig, A. and Starrett, D. (2003). Coping with uncertainty: A call for a new science-policy forum. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 32(5):330–335.
Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J., and Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: A theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(3):437–454.
Klijn, E.-H. and Skelcher, C. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Public Administration, 85(3):587–608.
Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Koontz, T. M. and Moore Johnson, E. (2004). One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed groups accomplishments. Policy Sciences, 37:185–204.
Krause, G. A. and Douglas, J. W. (2012). Organizational structure and the optimal design of policymaking panels: Evidence from consensus group commissions’ revenue forecasts in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1):135–149.
Krick, E. (2006). Politikberatung durch Expertengremien: Legitimation und Funktion der ‘Hartz’- und der ‘Rürup’-Kommission. Arbeitspapier 2/2006, University of Osnabrück, Social Science Faculty, Osnabrück.
Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3):291–303.
Landau, M. 1969. Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap. Public Administration Review 29 (4): 346-58.
Landre, B. K. and Knuth, B. A. (1993). Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes basin. Society & Natural Resources, 6(3):229–257.
Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., and Sabatier, P. A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4):645–670.
Leifeld, P. and Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3):731–744.
Lentsch, J. and Weingart, P. (2011). The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Long, N. E. (1958). The local community as an ecology of games. American Journal of Sociology, 64:251–261.
Lövbrand, E. (2007). Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(1):39–47.
Lubell, M. (2003). Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 56:309–323.
Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3):549–573.
Lubell, M. (2007). Familiarity breeds trust: Collective action in a policy domain. Journal of Politics, 69:237–250.
Lubell, M. (2013). Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(3):537–559.
Lubell, M., Henry, A. D., and McCoy, M. (2010). Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2):287–300.
Lubell, M., Schneider, M., Scholz, J. T., and Mete, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1):148–163.
Lundin, M. and Öberg, P. (2014). Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making. Policy Sciences, 47:25–49.
McAllister, R. R. J., McCrea, R., and Lubell, M. N. (2013). Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia. Regional Environmental Change. Forthcoming.
Molina, O. and Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The past, present, and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5:305–331.
Nagel, P. (2006). Policy games and venue-shopping: Working the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in rehabilitation services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(4):3–16.
Öberg, P. (2002). Does administrative corporatism promote trust and deliberation? Governance, 15(4):455–475.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Parkins, J. (2002). Forest management and advisory groups in Alberta: An empirical critique of an emergent public sphere. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 27(2):163–184.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12:295–336.
Pralle, S. B. (2003). Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3):233–260.
Provan, K. G., and Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 229-52.
Rhodes, R. A. W. and Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2):181–205.
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1):3–29.
Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: An advocacy coalition framework. Science Communication, 8:649–692.
Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66:239–278.
Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The joint-decision trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4):845–864.
Scholz, J. T. and Stiftel, B. (2005). Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict. Resources for the Future. RFF Press, Washington DC, USA.
Selsky, J. W. and Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6):849–873.
Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36:175–205.
Smaldino, P. E. and Lubell, M. (2011). An institutional mechanism for assortment in an ecology of games. PLoS One, 6(8):e23019.
Steelman, T. A. and Ascher, W. (1997). Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy Sciences, 30:71–90.
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state—and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. European Sociological Review, 1(2):119–138.
Sörensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3):195–218.
The LSE GV314 Group (2013). Evaluation under contract: Government pressure and the production of policy research. Public Administration, 92(1):224-239.
Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11:497–520.
Thomson, A. M. and Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66:20–32.
Turcotte, M.-F. and Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4):447–464.
van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1):29–52.
Vasseur, L., Lafrance, L., Ansseau, C., Renaud, D., Morin, D., and Audet, T. (1997). Advisory committee: A powerful tool for helping decision makers in environmental issues. Environmental Management, 21(3):359–365.
von Beyme, K. (1988). Politik und wissenschaftliche Information der Politiker in modernen Industriegesellschaften. In Der Vergleich in der Politikwissenschaft, pages 347–368. Piper, München.
Weingart, P. (2006). ‘Demokratisierung’ der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Eine Antwort auf die Legitimationsdilemmata im Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Politik? In Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, editor, Politikberatung in Deutschland, pages 73–84. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.
Wilks, S. (2007). Boardization and corporate governance in the UK as a response to depoliticization and failing accountability. Public Policy and Administration, 22(4):443–460.
Woldendorp, J. and Keman, H. (2010). Dynamic institutional analysis: Measuring corporatist intermediation. Quality & Quantity, 44:259–275.
Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., and Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2):175–192.
Altmetric
Altmetric