Tarazona Vento, A. (2017) Mega-project meltdown: post-politics, neoliberal urban regeneration and Valencia's fiscal crisis. Urban Studies, 54(1), pp. 68-84. (doi: 10.1177/0042098015625025)
|
Text
117424.pdf - Accepted Version 233kB |
Abstract
Drawing on the literature of post-politics and post-democracy, the literature of neoliberalism as mode of governance and the study of the city of Valencia’s long-standing emphasis on the development of prestige mega-projects of iconic architecture as a means to achieve economic regeneration and urban revitalisation, this paper evaluates the social and economic effects of urban mega-projects and analyses them as conduits of neoliberal globalisation and de-politicisation of the public sphere. On the one hand, an urban policy based on the use of mega-projects represents a turn from welfarism to entrepreneurialism which, beyond the evident urban transformation and re-imaging, results in an increase in social inequality, the creation of precarious jobs, and an underinvestment in social services. On the other hand, the mechanisms used to implement mega-projects – including both exceptionality measures and privatisation of management through the creation of semi-public delivery bodies – result in a lack of transparency and democratic control, which in turn lead to more authoritative and privatised forms of decision-making. Moreover, mega-projects – through their focus on expertise and technocracy and a populist politics and discourse constructed around them – play a crucial role in the erosion of democracy and the establishment of a consensual politics where ideological struggle does not exist.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Tarazona Vento, Dr Amparo |
Authors: | Tarazona Vento, A. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies |
Journal Name: | Urban Studies |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
ISSN: | 0042-0980 |
ISSN (Online): | 1360-063X |
Published Online: | 15 January 2016 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2016 Urban Studies Journal Ltd |
First Published: | First published in Urban Studies 54(1): 68-84 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher policy |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record