On staying grounded and avoiding Quixotic dead ends

Barsalou, L. W. (2016) On staying grounded and avoiding Quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(4), pp. 1122-1142. (doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3) (PMID:27112560) (PMCID:PMC4974262)

[img]
Preview
Text
117350.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

616kB

Abstract

The 15 articles in this special issue on The Representation of Concepts illustrate the rich variety of theoretical positions and supporting research that characterize the area. Although much agreement exists among contributors, much disagreement exists as well, especially about the roles of grounding and abstraction in conceptual processing. I first review theoretical approaches raised in these articles that I believe are Quixotic dead ends, namely, approaches that are principled and inspired but likely to fail. In the process, I review various theories of amodal symbols, their distortions of grounded theories, and fallacies in the evidence used to support them. Incorporating further contributions across articles, I then sketch a theoretical approach that I believe is likely to be successful, which includes grounding, abstraction, flexibility, explaining classic conceptual phenomena, and making contact with real-world situations. This account further proposes that (1) a key element of grounding is neural reuse, (2) abstraction takes the forms of multimodal compression, distilled abstraction, and distributed linguistic representation (but not amodal symbols), and (3) flexible context-dependent representations are a hallmark of conceptual processing.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Barsalou, Professor Lawrence
Authors: Barsalou, L. W.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology
Journal Name:Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
Publisher:Springer-Verlag
ISSN:1069-9384
ISSN (Online):1531-5320
Published Online:25 April 2016
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2016 The Author
First Published:First published in Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23(4): 1122-1142
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record