Sources
Digital Image of The Great Isaiah Scroll, the Israel Museum, Jerusalem: http://dss.collections.imj.org.il/
References
Barry, P. 2007. Literature in Contexts. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Barthes, R. 1979. “From work to text”. Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. by J. V. Harari, pp. 73-81. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Buzeck, M. & J. Müller. 2010. “TwitterSigns: Microblogging on the walls”. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Multimedia 2010, Firenze, Italy, October 25–29, 2010, ed. by A. D. Bimbo, S. Chang, & A. W. M. Smeulders, 819–22.
Caie, G. D. 1988. “The vernacular poems in MS CCCC201 as penitential literature”. A Literary Miscellany Presented to Eric Jacobsen ed. by G. D. Caie & H. Nørgaard, 72–77. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Celik, I., F. Abel & G. Houben. 2011. “Learning semantic relationships between entities in Twitter”. International Conference of Web Engineering (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6757), ed. by S. Auer, O. Diaz & G.A. Papadopoulos, 167–181.
Dahood, R. 1988. “The use of coloured initials and other division markers in early versions of ‘Ancrene Riwle’”. Medieval Studies Presented to George Kane, ed. by E. D. Kennedy, R. Waldron, & J. S. Wittig. Woodbridge: D.S. Brewer.
Fulk, R. D. 2006. “The origin of the numbered sections in ‘Beowulf’ and in other Old English poems”. ASE 35. 91–109.
Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Repr. in translation M. Mclean (1987) from Seuils with permission of Georges Borchardt, Paris.
Green, J.M.E. 2012. Judgement Day I, Resignation A and Resignation B: A Conceptual Unit in the Exeter Book. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Glasgow.
Greetham, D. C. 1994. Textual Scholarship: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Humphries, L. 2010. “Historicizing microblogging”. CHI Workshop on Micro-Blogging 2010 April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, Georgia. 1–4.
Hurlock, J. & M. L. Wilson. 2011. “Searching Twitter: Separating the tweet from the chaff”. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
Java, A., X. Song, T. Finin & B. Tseng. 2007. “Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities”. In Proceedings of Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop 2007.
Kelly, S. & J. J. Thompson, eds. 2005. Imagining the Book. Turnhout: Brepols.
Kisor, Y. 2006. “Numerical composition and ‘Beowulf’: A reconsideration”. ASE 38. 41–7
Mak, B. 2011. How the Page Matters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
McGann, J. 2001. Radiant Textuality. New York: Palgrave.
McGann, J., ed. 2007. The Rossetti Archive. http://www.rossettiarchive.org/
McKenzie, D. F. 1986. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. London: British Library.
Minnis, A. & J. Roberts, eds. 2007. Text, Image and Interpretation: Studies in Anglo-Saxon Literature and its Insular Context in Honour of Éamonn Ó Carragáin. Turnhout: Brepols
Nichols, S. G. & S. Wenzel. 1996. The Whole Book: Cultural Perspectives on the Medieval Miscellany. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Parkes, M.B. 1993. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Univ. of California Press.
Robinson, P. R. & R. Zim, eds. 1997. Of the Making of Books: Medieval Manuscripts, their Scribes and Readers. Essays Presented to M. B. Parkes. Aldershot: Scholar Press
Robinson, P. 2003. “Where we are with electronic scholarly editions, and where we want to be”. Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie 5: 125–146.
Rudy, K. 2010. “Dirt books: Quantifying patterns of use in medieval manuscripts using a densitometer”. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art 2(1–2). http://www.jhna.org/index.php/past-issues/volume-2-issue-1-2
Sanz, A. & M. Goicoechea. 2012. “Literary reading rituals and practices on new interfaces”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 27: 331–346.
Schulz, C. M. 1974. Peanuts. Comic originally published April 19, 1974.
Stoicheff, P. & A. Taylor, eds. 2004. The Future of the Page. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Watterson, B. 1989. Calvin and Hobbes. Comic originally published September 24, 1989.
White, T. 2012. “The dark is light enough: The layout of the tale of Sir Thopas”. Dark Chaucer: An Assortment, ed. by M. Seaman, E. Joy & N. Masciandaro. New York: Punctum Books.
Yus, F. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Blogs cited
Cohen, J. J. 2012. “The best MLA is the one I didn’t attend: Tweeting the conference.” In the Medieval Middle. http://www.inthemedievalmiddle.com/2012/01/best-mla-is-one-i-didnt-attend-twitter.html
Kwakkel, E. 2013. “My first year on Twitter: How I became @erik_kwakkel”. Medieval Fragments. http://medievalfragments.wordpress.com/2013/01/18/my-first-year-on-twitter-how-i-became-erik_kwakkel/
Zimmer, B. 2013. “The cyberpragmatics of bounding asterisks”. Language Log. http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4466
Discussion lists cited
McCarthy, W. 2013. “Why the asterisks?” Humanist 26.832. http://lists.digitalhumanities.org/pipermail/humanist/2013-March/010729.html>
van Zundert, J. 2013. “Why the *********?” Humanist 26.838. http://lists.digitalhumanities.org/pipermail/humanist/2013-March/010735.html