Influence of close resection margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma

Wong, L. S., McMahon, J., Devine, J., McLellan, D., Thompson, E., Farrow, A., Moos, K. and Ayoub, A. (2012) Influence of close resection margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50(2), pp. 102-108. (doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.05.008) (PMID:21742422)

Abstract

There is a lack of consistency among published reports in the definition of what constitutes close resection margins (1–5 mm) in the surgical treatment of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Our aim was to define what would constitute close resection margins in predicting local recurrence and disease-specific survival. The study comprised 192 previously untreated patients with oral and oropharyngeal SCC who were recruited at the Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, from 2001 to 2007 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Resection was the primary treatment and the surgical margins were recorded for all patients. Statistical analyses were aided by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 15.0, and MedCalc software. The status of the surgical margins was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to define the cut-off point. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to establish predictive factors for local recurrence and disease-specific survival. Of 192 patients, 23 (12%) had involved margins (<1.0 mm), 107 (56%) had close margins (1.0–2.0 mm (16.1%); 2.1–3.0 mm (12%); 3.1–4.0 mm (10.4%); 4.1–5.0 mm (17.2%), and 62 (32.3%) had clear margins (5 mm). No predictive cut-off point was found that related close surgical margins to local recurrence. However, there was a significant adverse association between surgical margins ≤1.6 mm and disease-specific survival. In recommending postoperative adjuvant treatment for oral and oropharyngeal SCC, we suggest that surgical margins within 2 mm should be considered as the cut-off. However, other clinical and pathological prognostic factors should also be taken into consideration when recommending further treatment.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Ayoub, Professor Ashraf and Moos, Professor Khursheed and McLellan, Dr Douglas and Devine, Dr John and McMahon, Dr Jeremy
• Authors: Wong, L. S., McMahon, J., Devine, J., McLellan, D., Thompson, E., Farrow, A., Moos, K., and Ayoub, A.
• College/School: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing; College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing > Dental School
• Journal Name: British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
• Publisher: Elsevier
• ISSN: 0266-4356
• ISSN (Online): 1532-1940