Exploring attitudes towards a randomised controlled trial of venous access devices – a nested pre-trial qualitative study

Ritchie, M., Kelly, L., Moss, J., Paul, J. and Shaw, R. (2015) Exploring attitudes towards a randomised controlled trial of venous access devices – a nested pre-trial qualitative study. Journal of Vascular Access, 16(5), pp. 407-412. (doi:10.5301/jva.5000447) (PMID:26349872)

[img]
Preview
Text
114288.pdf - Accepted Version

651kB

Abstract

Purpose: This pre-trial qualitative research study was carried out to explore patient and clinical staff attitudes to central venous access devices (CVADs). In addition, views about participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) were explored with the aim of maximising recruitment to an imminent RCT of three CVADs. Methods: Three patient focus groups (each comprising three patients) and 23 interviews with clinical staff were conducted. Interviews and focus group discussions were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised, uploaded to the QSR NVivo10 qualitative software programme and thematically analysed. Results: Analysis of focus group interviews revealed the added challenges that a CVAD poses to patients with cancer. Four key themes emerged: continuity of daily life, pain and discomfort, stigma (a mark of disgrace associated with certain conditions) and self-preservation. The findings show the impact of a CVAD on patients’ ability to manage their condition. Clinical staff interviews highlighted several potential barriers to recruitment; a lack of equipoise (genuine clinical uncertainty as to which intervention is the most beneficial), concerns about the logistics of device insertion and a perceived requirement for education and training. Conclusions: This qualitative study raises awareness of key areas of concern to patients who need a CVAD for chemotherapy delivery. It was identified that there is a need for clearer patient information around CVADs. Additionally it allows investigators to identify barriers to recruitment in a timely manner in order to minimise the potential for conflict between the roles of carer and researcher and consequently, maximise recruitment to the RCT.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Paul, Mr James and Moss, Professor Jonathan and Ritchie, Ms Moira and Shaw, Dr Rebecca
Authors: Ritchie, M., Kelly, L., Moss, J., Paul, J., and Shaw, R.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Cancer Sciences
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > Institute of Health and Wellbeing > General Practice and Primary Care
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
College of Social Sciences > School of Education
Journal Name:Journal of Vascular Access
Publisher:Wichtig Publishing
ISSN:1129-7298
ISSN (Online):1724-6032
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2016 Wichtig Publishing
First Published:First published in Journal of Vascular Access 16(5):407-412
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record