Egan, M., Kearns, A. , Katikireddi, S. V. , Curl, A. , Lawson, K. and Tannahill, C. (2016) Proportionate universalism in practice? A quasi-experimental study (GoWell) of a UK neighbourhood renewal programme’s impact on health inequalities. Social Science and Medicine, 152, pp. 41-49. (doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.026) (PMID:26829008)
|
Text
114214.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 368kB |
Abstract
Recommendations to reduce health inequalities frequently emphasise improvements to socio-environmental determinants of health. Proponents of ‘proportionate universalism’ argue that such improvements should be allocated proportionally to population need. We tested whether city-wide investment in urban renewal in Glasgow (UK) was allocated to ‘need’ and whether this reduced health inequalities. We identified a longitudinal cohort (n = 1006) through data linkage across surveys conducted in 2006 and 2011 in 14 differentially disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Each neighbourhood received renewal investment during that time, allocated on the basis of housing need. We grouped neighbourhoods into those receiving ‘higher’, ‘medium’ or ‘lower’ levels of investment. We compared residents’ self-reported physical and mental health between these three groups over time using the SF-12 version 2 instrument. Multiple linear regression adjusted for baseline gender, age, education, household structure, housing tenure, building type, country of birth and clustering.Areas receiving higher investment tended to be most disadvantaged in terms of baseline health, income deprivation and markers of social disadvantage. After five years, mean mental health scores improved in ‘higher investment’ areas relative to ‘lower investment’ areas (b=4.26; 95%CI=0.29, 8.22; P=0.036). Similarly, mean physical health scores declined less in high investment compared to low investment areas (b=3.86; 95%CI=1.96, 5.76; P<0.001). Relative improvements for medium investment (compared to lower investment) areas were not statistically significant. Findings suggest that investment in housing-led renewal was allocated according to population need and this led to modest reductions in area-based inequalities in health after five years. Study limitations include a risk of selection bias. This study demonstrates how non-health interventions can, and we believe should, be evaluated to better understand if and how health inequalities can be reduced through strategies of allocating investment in social determinants of health according to need.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Curl, Dr Angela and Katikireddi, Professor Vittal and Egan, Dr Matthew and Kearns, Professor Ade and Tannahill, Dr Carol |
| Authors: | Egan, M., Kearns, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Curl, A., Lawson, K., and Tannahill, C. |
| College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies |
| Journal Name: | Social Science and Medicine |
| Publisher: | Elsevier B.V. |
| ISSN: | 0277-9536 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1873-5347 |
| Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2016 The Authors |
| First Published: | First published in Social Science and Medicine 152:41-49 |
| Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a Creative Commons License |
| Related URLs: |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Funder and Project Information
Funder and Project Information